Last updated:
May 27, 2015


Site Map:

Back to Home

Courses and Syllabi

Vita

Classroom Policies


Dr. Laura L. Runge
Office: CPR 360 D
Phone: 813-974-9496


Please
Contact Me
with questions,
comments,
etc.

LAE 6389 Practice Teaching Literature


Class 7: Evaluation and Assessment

    McKeachie, chaps. 7, 8, 9, 10
    Sherry Linkon, "The Reader's Apprentice" in course docs
    Evaluating Wikipedia pamphlet in course docs

    Wikipedia assignment: peer review articles in sandbox; use recommendations from Evaluating Wikipedia;
    Assignment: Group evaluation of purchased student paper
    Post #3 Group B / Response Group A

Class Objectives:

    Discuss Gen Ed assessment requirements
    Discuss: Matching Learning objectives and outcomes. See FKL website.
    Discuss Evaluation, Assessment and Grading
    In class practical on student writing

    Student presentation: Syllabus check - Heather


Notes and Discussion Questions:

"The Reader's Apprentice"

This essay provides further information or elaboration on the importance of teaching interpretation in literature classrooms. Please read and evaluate how it might influence your decisions in the classroom. What is useful here? What provokes reaction or, rather, response?

From Linkon, the following ideas follow closely the model set up by Blau and merit continued interest:

  • Critical cultural reading
  • Teaching interpretation
  • Becoming expert readers (p. 251)
  • Six practices that constitute slow and recursive cultural reading: 1) inquiry, 2) considering multiple positions, 3) self-awareness, 4) examining cultural context, 5) revisiting the text and one's ideas, 6) making connections
  • Analysis of texts relies upon thorough and complex understanding of culture and history
  • Reading and rereading allows the expert reader to gain new insights
  • Readings can be complex, ambiguous and even contradictory at times

    What does Linkon's article add to your understanding of teaching the reading process?

    McKeachie, Chapter Seven: Assessing, Testing and Evaluating: Grading is Not the Most Important Function

    McKeachie presents nine premises at the start of the chapter that are thought provoking. What do think is feasible for your classroom?

    #3 Use some nongraded tests and assessments that provide feedback to you. How might you do this? Do you think this would be helpful for you as a teacher?

    #4 Check your assessment methods against your goals. Are you really assessing what you hoped to achieve: for example, higher order thinking? This is an excellent question and McKeachie provides some ideas for evaluating your testing against your objectives. How might this help you structure your assignments? Your grading weights?

    #6 Assessment is not synonymous with testing. What does this premise mean for you?

    How will you incorporate self-assessment into your class? Do you think it is worthwhile to train students to do self-assessment?

    Chapter Eight: Testing: the Details

    Some of you plan to incorporate tests (or quizzes) in your syllabus. How might the advice in this chapter help you plan this more effectively? Did this chapter give you new ideas about inventive ways to use tests.

    Dr. Gould has one of most innovative methods of testing I've seen for literature. See course docs for two examples of his take-home exams. See also his course on Victorian Novel for examples of assignments.

    After reading McKeachie's advice, what new things did you think about in terms of grading the exams?

    What might you as an instructor learn about the class from a test?

    What strategies might you develop to increase student performance on your tests?

    Feel free to use and adopt my workshop on writing good essay exams ( http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~runge/Writing_Workshop.htm).

    We have been discussing cheating for a while. What does this chapter offer you in terms of practical information and advice for why students cheat, preventing cheating and dealing with cheating?

    Chapter 9: Responding to Writing

    Does this chapter offer any new insights on responding to writing that you can use in a literature classroom?
    What kind of written comments do you / will you provide on your students literary essays?
    What suggestions do you find useful? How might you improve this chapter?

    Chapter 10: ABC's of Assigning Grades

    If we look at grading as communication, McKeachie suggests, four important points become apparent.

      1. Evaluation is a great deal more than giving a grade: more comments needed, more audiences intended
      2. What a professor means by a grade depends on how it is received by the graded
      3. Professors cannot change the meaning of grades unilaterally
      4. The meaning of grades has changed over the past 50 years; whereas a C used to be average it is now more accurate to think of a B as average
    What do these points suggest to you? How does this affect the way you assign grades?

    Can you see a point to using both contract grading and competency grading styles?

    How are grades related to learning?

    ************************

    Wikipedia peer-review

    Using the pamphlet on "Evaluating Wikipedia" identify elements of a quality article in Wikipedia? What are the signs of poor quality?
    On our Wikipedia course page, identify two students whose articles you will edit; please make sure everyone gets edited.
    For two of your peers, visit the articles they are editing in their sandboxes and examine their contributions. On their user talk pages, offer some assessment of the quality of the contributions and if possible some recommendations for changes
    In class, you will review the suggestions made by your classmates and we will discuss.

    Active learning and discussion

    Grading a Student Paper

    For the second part of the grading assignment, you will be responsible for reading one of the purchased papers and grading it. Please evaluate and grade this paper the way you would a paper for the literature class you are planning. The objective of this exercise is to make us aware of our own evaluating tendencies and principles and to share these with others so as to learn 1) other possibilities and 2) the range of acceptable and unacceptable methods of evaluating literary essays.

    Details for exchanging papers will be decided in class.

    When you return to class on Tuesday, I will ask you to compare your evaluation and grading. Please examine the process of evaluating and become self-reflexive about your own principles. Then we will share our results with the group.

    Important! Choose one member of your group to submit your purchased essay through turnitin so that I can have a plagiarism report to share with the class. You can do this by using the "Assignments" link in canvas.


  • Back to Top of Page