Use back arrow above to return to the Table of
Contents
Shaw and Other
Dramatists
See also Caesar and Cleopatra, Cymbeline Refinished, The
Dark Lady of the Sonnets, Saint Joan, and Shakes versus Shav
Rodenbeck,
John von B. ‘A Shaw / Shakespeare checklist.’ Shaw Review 14 1971 95-99
Almási,
Miklós. A modern dráma útjain: az újabb dramatörtenet és Shakespeare—i
hagyományok.
Armstrong,
William A. ‘Bernard Shaw and Forbes Robertson’s Hamlet.’ Shakespeare
Quarterly 15 1964 27-31
Bertolini,
John A. ‘Wilde and Shakespeare in Shaw’s You Never Can Tell.’ SHAW
27 2007 156-64
Brown,
Ivor. Shaw in his time.
Cohn,
Ruby. Modern Shakespeare offshoots.
Collins,
P. A. W. ‘Shaw on Shakespeare.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 8 1957 1-13
Denninghaus,
Friedhelm. ‘Determinism and voluntarism in Shaw and Shakespeare.’ Shaw
Review 19 1976 120-31
Diller,
Hans J. ‘Linguistic searchlights and philological buckets: a case study of
their interdependence (the conceptual field of persuade / convince).’
Pp 143-64 in Jacek Fisiak, ed. Historical linguistics and philology. NY:
Mouton de Gruyter, 1990 (use of the verbs by Shakespeare and Shaw)
DiPietro,
Carl. Shakespeare and modernism.
Dukore,
Bernard F. ‘A re-examination of Shaw’s “On cutting Shakespeare.”’ pp 119-35 in Conolly
-----.
‘Shaw on Hamlet.’ Educational Theatre Journal 23 1971 152-59
Eastman,
Arthur. A short history of Shakespearean criticism. NY: Random House,
1968, 164-77
Egan,
Gabriel. Shakespeare and Marx.
Egri,
Péter. ‘Bernard Shaw Shakespearekritikája.’ Pp 129-46 in László Kéry et al.,
eds. Shakespeare-tanulmányok.
Elliott,
Robert C. ‘Shaw’s Captain Bluntschli: a latter-day Falstaff.’ Modern
Language Notes 67 1952 461-64
Ewbank,
Inga S. ‘Shakespeare, Shaw, Strindberg—and Kenneth Muir.’ Pp 44-46 in KM 80:
a birthday album for Kenneth Muir. Liverpool:
Fiske,
Foulkes,
Richard. ‘“Snatched ... from Shakespeare”: Louis Calvert and Bernard Shaw.’ Shavian
7 iv 1993 5-10
Fromm,
Harold. Bernard Shaw and the theater in the nineties: a study of Shaw’s
dramatic criticism.
Gassner,
John. Dramatic soundings: evaluations and retractions culled from 30 years
of dramatic criticism. NY: Crown, 1968, 76-86: ‘Shaw on Shakespeare’
Ghosh,
Bandana. ‘Shakespearian echo in some Shavian themes.’ Pp 23-34 in Pandey
Haywood,
Charles. ‘George Bernard Shaw on incidental music in the Shakespearean
theatre.’ Jahrbuch der Deutschen Shakespeare-Gesellschaft Ost 105 1969
168-82
-----.
‘George Bernard Shaw on Shakespearean music and the actor.’ Shakespeare
Quarterly 20 1969 417-26
Henderson,
Archibald. ‘Shaw and Shakespeare.’ Shaw Bulletin no. 6 1954 1-6
Horzyca,
Wilam. O dramacie.
Jackson,
Russell. ‘Shaw’s reviews of Daly’s Shakespeare: the wooing of Ada Rehan.’ Theatre
Research International 19 1994 203-13
Jaffé,
Gerhard. ‘Shaws oppfatning av dramatisk diktkunst sammenlignet med
Shakespeares.’ Edda 50 1950 56-92
King,
Annie P. ‘Shakespeare’s Shavian Cleopatra.’ SHAW 27 2007 165-74
Krabbe,
Henning. Bernard Shaw on Shakespeare and English Shakespearean acting.
Leary,
Daniel J. ‘Shaw and Shakespeare: why not!’ Independent Shavian 23 1985
6-8
Leech,
Clifford. ‘Shaw and Shakespeare.’ Pp 84-105 in Rosenblood 2 (the ‘dramas
of debate’ and the ‘dark comedies’)
Lenker,
Lagretta T. Fathers and daughters in Shakespeare and Shaw. Westport, CT:
Greenwood Pr., 2001. 201 pp
Lutz,
Jerry. Pitchman’s melody: Shaw about ‘Shakespear’. Lewisburg, PA:
Bucknell UP, 1974. 175 pp
Mason,
Ronald. ‘Shaw on Shakespeare.’ Shavian 4 1969-70 46-51
McInerney,
John M. ‘“Shakespearean” word-music as a dramatic resource in Shaw.’ Shaw
Review 14 1971 90-94, 99
Müller,
Wolfgang G. ‘George Bernard Shaw and Shakespeare: an intertextual analysis of Caesar
and Cleopatra.’ Pp 99-114 in Jürgen Kamm, ed. Twentieth-century theatre
and drama in English: Festschrift for Heinz Kosok on the occasion of his 65th
birthday. Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Verlag, 1999
Muir,
Kenneth. ‘Shaw and Shakespeare.’ Pp 13-22 in Eduard Kolb & Jörg Hasler,
eds. Festschrift Rudolf Stamm. Bern: Francke, 1969
Pearce,
Brian. ‘George Bernard Shaw and Henry Irving’s production of Cymbeline.’
Shakespeare in Southern Africa 6 1993 13-21
Pedersen,
Lisë. ‘Ducats and daughters in The Merchant of Venice and Major
Barbara.’ SHAW 4 1984 69-86
-----.
‘Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew vs. Shaw’s Pygmalion: male
chauvinism vs. women’s lib?’ Pp 14-22 in Weintraub, R (revised from Shaw
Review 17 1974 32-39)
Peters,
Sally. ‘Shaw’s double dethroned: The Dark Lady of the Sonnets, Cymbeline
Refinished, and Shakes Versus Shav.’ SHAW 7 1987 301-16
Price,
Joseph G. ‘The mirror to nature: Shaw’s Troilus and Cressida lecture.’ Shaw
Review 14 1971 68-72
Puschmann-Nalenz,
Barbara. ‘Jeanne d’Arc und der Mythos der Nationen in den Dramen William Shakespeares
und George Bernard Shaws.’ Pp 246-56 in P. Csobadi et al., eds. Politische
Mythen und nationale Identitäten im (Musik) Theater: Vorträge und Gespräche des
Salzburger Symposions 2001, I. Salzburg: Anif, 2003
Silverman,
Albert H. ‘Bernard Shaw’s Shakespeare criticism.’ PMLA 72 1957 722-36
Smith,
J. Percy. ‘GBS on Hamlet.’ Shavian no. 8 1957 14-17
-----.
The unrepentant pilgrim: a study of the development of Bernard Shaw.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965, 223-45: ‘Superman versus man: Bernard Shaw on
Shakespeare’ (from Yale Review 42 1952 67-82)
Stamm,
Rudolf. Zwischen Vision und Wirklichkeit. Bern: Francke, 1964, 91-119:
‘Shaw und Shakespeare’ (from Shakespeare Jahrbuch 94 1958 9-28)
Stone-Blackburn,
Susan. ‘Shaw on cutting Shakespeare.’ Shaw Review 22 1979 46-49
Studencki,
W»adys»aw. Szkice literackie: wielcy i mali. Opole:
Prace Opolskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciól Nauk, 1967, 3-46: ‘Kleopatra VII’
(literary versions, including Shaw’s and
Shakespeare’s)
Taneja,
G. R. ‘“Platitudinous fudge”: Shaw on Hamlet.’ Pp 35-52 in Pandey
Taylor,
Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: a cultural history, from the Restoration to
the present. NY: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989, 234-39 and see index
Weintraub,
Stanley. Journey to heartbreak: the crucible years of Bernard Shaw 1914-1918.
NY: Weybright & Talley, 1971, 333-43: ‘Appendix: Shaw’s Lear’
(revision of ‘Shaw’s Lear.’ Ariel: A Review of International English
Literature 1 iii 1970 59-68; also publ. as ‘Heartbreak House: Shaw’s
Lear.’ Modern Drama 15 1972 255-65; revised on pp 173-80 in his The
unexpected Shaw: biographical approaches to G.B.S. and his work. NY: Ungar,
1982)
West,
E. J. ‘G.B.S., music, and Shakespearean blank verse.’ Pp 344-56 in Elizabethan
studies and other essays in honor of George F. Reynolds. Boulder: Univ. of
Colorado Studies, 1945
-----.
‘G.B.S. on Shakespearean production.’ Studies in Philology 45 1948
216-35
Wilson,
Edwin. ‘Introduction.’ Pp ix-xxii in Shaw. Shaw on Shakespeare: an anthology
of Bernard Shaw’s writings on the plays and production of Shakespeare. Ed.
Wilson. NY: Dutton, 1961
Zbierski,
Henryk. ‘Shakespearean criticism and the influence of Bernard Shaw’s Dark
Lady of the Sonnets.’ Pp 192-201 in Stanislaw Helsztynski, ed. Poland’s
homage to Shakespeare, commemorating the fourth centenary of his birth
1564-1964. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publications, 1965
Bentley,
Eric. The playwright as thinker: a study of drama in modern times.
Amended ed. Cleveland: Meridian, 1955, 107-26, 132-40
-----.
Theatre of war: comments on 32 occasions. NY: Viking Pr., 1960, 183-211:
‘Ibsen, Shaw, Brecht’; repr. on pp 215-47 in The Brecht commentaries
1943-1980. NY: Grove Pr., 1981
Berst,
Charles A. ‘The Irrational Knot: the art of Shaw as a young Ibsenite.’
Journal of English and Germanic Philology 85 1986 222-48
Britain,
Ian M. ‘Bernard Shaw, Ibsen, and the ethics of English socialism.’ Victorian
Studies 21 1978 381-401
Brooks,
Harold F. ‘Pygmalion and When We Dead Awaken.’ Notes &
Queries 7 1960 469-71
Carlotti,
Edoardo G. La scena e i suoi specchi: aspetti della cultura teatrale
britannica tra Ottocento e Novecento. Lucca: Maria Pacini Fazzi, 1996,
153-78: ‘La realtà e la sue rappresentazioni: il new drama tra influenze
ibseniane e “shavismo”’
Cavallini,
Graziano. Ibsen, Shaw, Pirandello: analisi della funzione socio-pedagogica
del teatro. Milan: Cislaghi, 1964, 7-13, 41-68, 113-15
Cocco,
Maria R. ‘“Malodorous Ibsen.”’ Annali Istituto Universitario Orientale,
Napoli, Sezione Germanica 11 1968 171-93 (in Italian)
Dervin,
Daniel. Bernard Shaw: a psychological study. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell UP,
1975, 180-205: ‘Ibsenite’
Dhingra,
J. D. Ibsen and Shaw, a critical evaluation: experiments in theatre,
creative religion & other issues. Jalandhar: ABS, 1991. 311 pp
Dukore,
Bernard F. Money & politics in Ibsen, Shaw, and Brecht. Columbia:
Univ. of Missouri Pr., 1980. 172 pp
Durbach,
Errol. ‘Pygmalion: myth and anti-myth in the plays of Ibsen and Shaw.’ English
Studies in Africa 21 1978 23-31
Egri,
Péter. ‘A jelképtol a paradoxonig: az ibsenizmus shawi lényege.’ Filológiai
Közlöny 29 1983 74-94
-----.
‘Ibsen, Joyce, Shaw.’ Filológiai Közlöny 12 1966 109-33
Englert,
Uwe. ‘Versteinerte Weiblichkeit: zur Paradoxie vom lebendigen Totsein in Henrik
Ibsens Når vi døde vågner.’ Pp 193-219 in Günther Blaicher, ed. Death-in-life:
Studien zur historischen Entfaltung der Paradoxie der Entfremdung in der englischen
Literatur. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 1998 (part compares Pygmalion
to Ibsen’s play)
Ganz,
Arthur. ‘G.B.S.: the quintessential Ibsenite.’ Ibsen News and Comment 6
1985 24-26
Gassner,
John. Dramatic soundings: evaluations and retractions culled from 30 years
of dramatic criticism. NY: Crown, 1968, 87-105: ‘Shaw on Ibsen and the
drama of ideas’ (from pp 71-100 in Gassner, ed. Ideas in the drama. NY:
Columbia UP, 1964)
Gerould,
Daniel C. ‘George Bernard Shaw’s criticism of Ibsen.’ Comparative Literature
15 1963 130-45
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume I: 1856-1898: The search for love. NY:
Random House, 1988, 197-204 (on The Quintessence of Ibsenism)
Hwang, H. ‘The plot structure of George Bernard
Shaw’s didactic plays influenced by Ibsen.’ Journal
of Modern British and American Drama (Seoul) 19 ii 2006 147-68
Jahan,
Rahmat. The Ibsen-Shaw kinship. Calcutta: Writers Workshop, 2002. 102 pp
Lamm,
Martin. ‘Ibsen och Shaw.’ Edda 47 1947 130-40
Lutz,
Jerry. Pitchman’s melody: Shaw about ‘Shakespear’. Lewisburg, PA:
Bucknell UP, 1974, 57-87: ‘Music and thought: Shakespeare vs. Ibsen’
May,
Keith M. Ibsen and Shaw. London: Macmillan, 1985. 228 pp (Shaw’s plays
‘in the light of his use of Ibsen’)
McDowell,
Frederick P. W. ‘Fountainhead and fountain: Ibsen and Shaw.’ Shaw Review 23
1980 139-47
Munzar,
JiÍí. ‘Shaw und Ibsen.’ Brünner
Beiträge zur Germanistik und Nodistik 1 1977 137-51 (critique of The
Quintessence of Ibsenism)
Ochshorn,
Kathleen. ‘Who’s modern now? Shaw, Joyce, and Ibsen’s When We Dead Awaken.’
SHAW 25 2005 96-104
O’Donnell,
Norbert F. ‘Ibsen and Shaw: the tragic and the tragi-comic.’ Theatre Annual
15 1957-58 15-27
Ortiz,
Javier. ‘Bernard Shaw’s Ibsenisms.’ Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
7 1998 112-37
Raab, Michael. ‘Stockmann,
Ibsen und Shaw: in jeden stickt ein Volksfiend: Ibsens Dramaturgie
1882 und 2004.’ Pp 351-72 in
Franz N. Mennemeier & Bernhard Reitz, eds. Amüsement und
Schrecken: Studien zum Drama
und Theater des 19. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Francke, 2006
Reed,
Robert R. ‘Boss Mangan, Peer Gynt, and Heartbreak House.’ Shaw Review
2 iv 1959 6-12
Rem,
Tore. ‘“The provincial of provincials”: Ibsen’s strangeness and the process of
canonisation.’ Ibsen Studies 4 2004 205-26 (Shaw’s contribution to the
process)
Rodenbeck,
John von B. ‘The Irrational Knot: Shaw and the uses of Ibsen.’ Shaw
Review 12 1969 66-76
Shepherd-Barr,
Kirsten. Ibsen and early modernist theatre, 1890-1900. Westport, CT:
Greenwood Pr., 1997, see index
Strässner,
Matthias. Analytisches Drama. Munich: Fink, 1980, 170-222: ‘Ibsens
analytische Dramatik’ (treats Shaw’s commentary)
West,
E. J. ‘Shaw’s criticism of Ibsen: a reconsideration.’ University of Colorado
Studies, Series in Language and Literature 4 1953 101-27
Wiedner,
Elsie M. ‘Shaw’s transformation of Ibsen in The Devil’s Disciple.’ Shaw
Review 22 1979 23-28
Wisenthal,
J. L. ‘Shaw and Ibsen.’ Pp 3-73 in Wisenthal, ed. Shaw and Ibsen: Bernard
Shaw’s The Quintessence of Ibsenism and related writings. Toronto: Univ.
of Toronto Pr., 1979
Ahrens,
Rüdiger. ‘Motivgeschichtliche Aspekte der new woman im englischen Drama
der Jahrhundertwende.’ Pp 293-320 in Heinz J. Müllenbrock & Alfons Klein,
eds. Motive und Themen in englischsprachiger Literatur als Indikatoren
literaturgeschichtlicher Prozesse. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1990 (Pinero, Wilde,
Shaw, and after)
Beckson,
Karl. ‘Oscar Wilde’s celebrated remark on Bernard Shaw.’ Notes & Queries
41 1994 360-61
Bertolini,
John A. ‘Wilde and Shakespeare in Shaw’s You Never Can Tell.’ SHAW
27 2007 156-64
Bragan,
K. ‘Individuality, narcissism and the bipolar self.’ Australian & New
Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 24 1990 537-42 (Shaw and Wilde contrasted)
Eagleton,
Terry. ‘Oscar and George.’ Nineteenth-Century Contexts 18 1994 205-23
Edwards,
Owen D. ‘Shaw and the ghost of Wilde.’ New Edinburgh Review 63 1983
16-19, 24-26
Evans,
T. F. ‘Shaw and Wilde.’ Wildean 8 1996 31-36
Gordon,
David J. ‘Shavian comedy and the shadow of Wilde.’ Pp 124-43 in Innes
Johnson,
Wendell S. ‘Fallen women, lost children: Wilde and the theatre of the
nineties.’ Tennessee Studies in Literature 27, 196-211 (also cited as
Don R. Cox, ed. Sexuality and Victorian literature. Knoxville: Univ. of
Tennessee Pr., 1984) (on Wilde, Pinero, and Shaw)
Jordan,
John. ‘Shaw, Wilde, Synge and Yeats: ideas, epigrams, blackberries and
chassis.’ Pp 209-25 in Richard Kearney, ed. The Irish mind: exploring
intellectual traditions. Dublin: Wolfhound Pr., 1985
Livermore,
Ann. ‘Goldoni, Wilde and Shaw: “co-inventors” of comedy.’ Revue de
Littérature Comparée 53 1979 108-24
Lockhart,
J. H. K. ‘Shaw, Wilde, and the revival of the comedy of manners.’ Hermathena
106 1968 18-22
Nassaar,
Christopher S. ‘Wilde's Lady Windermere's Fan and Shaw's Mrs.
Warren’s Profession.’ Explicator 56 1998 137-39
Páll,
Árpád. Évszázadok drámái napjaink színpadán. Budapest: Kriterion, 1976,
286-307: ‘A paradoxon mestereinek paradoxona: Wilde- és Shaw-elÅadások margójára’
Rawson,
Claude. ‘Killing the poor: an Anglo-Irish theme?’ Essays in Criticism 49
1999 101-31 (Swift, Wilde, and Shaw are featured)
Schmidgall,
Gary. The Stranger Wilde: interpreting Oscar. NY: Dutton, 1994, 345-74:
‘Wildeshawshow’
Schrank,
Bernice. ‘Mrs Erlynne, Mrs Warren and the nineteenth-century stage stereotype
of the fallen woman.’ Pp 134-45 in Joseph McMinn, ed. The internationalism
of Irish literature and drama. Gerrards Cross: Smythe, 1992
Thies,
Henning. Namen im Kontext von Dramen: Studien zur Funktion von Personennamen
im englischen, amerikanischen und deutschen Drama. Frankfurt: Lang, 1978,
207-23: ‘“Gefallene Frauen” bei Wilde, Pinero und Shaw’
Walshe,
Eibhear. ‘“Angels of death”: Wilde’s Salomé and Shaw’s Saint Joan.’
Irish University Review 27 1997 24-32
Weintraub,
Stanley. Shaw’s people: Victoria to Churchill. Univ. Park: Penn State
UP, 1996, 30-55: ‘“The Hibernian school”: Oscar Wilde and Bernard Shaw’ (from SHAW
13 1993 25-49)
Wisenthal,
J. L. ‘Wilde, Shaw, and the play of conversation.’ Modern Drama 37 1994
206-19
Dukore, Bernard F. ‘The Madras House prefinished.’ Educational
Theatre Journal 24 1972 133-38 (prints and comments on Shaw’s version of
the finale of Granville Barker’s play)
Evans, T. F. ‘Granville Barker: Shavian disciple.’ Shaw
Bulletin 2 v 1958 1-19
Kennedy, Dennis. Granville Barker and the dream of theatre.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985, 62-82: ‘Shaw’s natural son’
Mehra, M. M. ‘Granville Barker in the shadow of Shaw.’ Rajasthan
University Studies in English 7 1974 41-48
Morgan, Margery M. ‘Edwardian feminism and the drama: Shaw
and Granville Barker.’ Cahiers Victoriens & Édouardiennes 9-10 1979
63-85
-----. The Shavian playground: an exploration of the art
of George Bernard Shaw. London: Methuen, 1972, 187-99: ‘Bernard Shaw on the
tightrope: Misalliance’ (the play’s relation to Granville Barker’s The
Madras House; from Modern Drama 4 1962 343-54); 303-15 (incorporates
‘Two varieties of political drama: The Apple Cart and Granville Barker’s
His Majesty.’ Shavian 2 vi 1962 9-16)
Nickson, Richard. ‘Using words on the stage: Shaw and
Granville-Barker.’ Modern Drama 27 1984 409-19
Pálfy, István. ‘A rádöbbenés dramaturgiája: Shaw, Granville
Barker és Galsworthy.’ Filológiai Közlöny 18 1972 394-99
Peters, Sally. Bernard Shaw: the ascent of the superman.
New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1996, 242-56 and see index
Sydenstricker, Glória. ‘The Shaw / Maeterlinck touch in
Granville-Barker’s drama.’ Independent Shavian 34 1996 13-16
Whitaker, Thomas R. ‘Granville Barker’s answer to Heartbreak.’
SHAW 10 1990 85-95 (The Secret Life)
Whitebrook, Peter. ‘Harley Granville Barker and Bernard
Shaw.’ Pp 40-48 in Jan McDonald & Leslie Hill, eds. Harley Granville
Barker: an Edinburgh retrospective 1992. Glasgow: Theatre Studies
Publications, 1993
Habart,
Michel. ‘Une mère et deux fils.’ Cahiers de la Companie Madeleine Renaud /
Jean-Louis
Barrault 37 1962 17-31 (compares O’Casey with Shaw)
Kosok, Heinz. O’Casey
the dramatist. Gerrards Cross: Smythe, 1985, 343-45 and see index
-----. ‘Two Irish
perspectives on World War I: Bernard Shaw and Sean O’Casey.’ Hungarian
Journal of English and American Studies 2 ii 1996 17-29
Metscher, Thomas. Sean
O’Caseys dramatischer Stil. Braunschweig: Westermann, 1968, 131-36
Mikhail, E. H. ‘Bernard
Shaw and Sean O’Casey: an unrecorded friendship.’ Pp 123-46 in Robert G.
Lowery, ed. Essays on Sean O’Casey’s autobiogaphies.
O’Casey, Sean. The
green crow. NY: Braziller, 1956, 197-204: ‘A whisper about Bernard Shaw’;
205-11: ‘Bernard Shaw: an appreciation of a fighting idealist’ (latter from New
York Times Book Review Nov 12 1950 41, 44)
O’Connor, Garry. Sean
O’Casey: a life. NY: Atheneum, 1988, see index
Parker, R. Brian.
‘Bernard Shaw and Sean O’Casey.’ Queen’s Quarterly 73 1966 13-34; repr.
on pp 1-29 in Rosenblood
Rabey, David I. British
and Irish political drama in the twentieth century: implicating the audience.
Rattigan, Terence.
‘Concerning the play of ideas.’ New Statesman and Nation 39 1950 241-42;
repr. on pp 74-77 in
Rollins, Ronald G. Sean
O’Casey’s drama: verisimilitude and vision. Univ.: Univ. of Alabama Pr.,
1979, pp (compares Purple Dust and John Bull’s Other Island; from
‘Shaw and O’Casey: John Bull and his other island.’ Shaw Review 10 1967
60-69)
Schrank, Bernice. ‘World
War I in the plays of Shaw, O’Casey and McGuiness.’ Études Irlandaises
17 ii 1992 29-36
Weintraub, Stanley. Shaw’s
people:
-----. The unexpected
Shaw: biographical approaches to G.B.S. and his work. NY: Ungar, 1982,
211-22: ‘Shaw’s other Keegan: O’Casey and G.B.S.’; first publ. on pp 212-27 in
David Krause & Robert G. Lowery, eds. Sean O’Casey: centenary essays.
Bentley, Eric. Theatre
of war: comments on 32 occasions. NY: Viking Pr., 1960, 183-211: ‘Ibsen,
Shaw, Brecht’; also on pp 215-47 in The Brecht commentaries 1943-1980.
NY: Grove Pr., 1981
Dubois, Michel, &
Guillaume Dujardin. ‘Shaw et Brecht vus de plateau: des convergences ignorées?’
pp 159-67 in Brennan
Dukore, Bernard F.
‘Brecht’s Shavian saint.’ Quarterly Journal of Speech 50 1964
136-39; repr. in
-----. Money &
politics in Ibsen, Shaw, and Brecht.
Hunningher, B. ‘Shaw en
Brecht: wegen en grenzen van sozialistisch theater.’ Forum der Letteren
12 1971 173-90
Mayer, Hans. ‘Johanna
oder die Vernunft des Herzens: über die Jeanne-d’Arc-Stücke von Schiller, Shaw
und Brecht.’ Theater Heute 9 vi 1968 22-27
-----. Aussenseiter.
Mensching, Gerhard. ‘Die
Kirche auf dem Theater: Shaw—Schnitzler—Brecht—Hochhuth.’ Pp 332-45 in Religion
und Religionen: Festschrift für Gustav Mensching zu seinem 65. Geburtstag.
Pauli, Manfred. ‘Bernard
Shaw and Bertolt Brecht: theatrical effects and dramatic techniques.’ Pp 149-60
in Conolly
Schoeps, Karl H. Bertolt
Brecht und Bernard Shaw.
-----. ‘Epic structures
in the plays of Bernard Shaw and Bertolt Brecht.’ Pp 28-43 in Siegfried Mews
& Herbert Knust, eds. Essays on Brecht.
Watson, George J. Drama:
an introduction. NY:
Adler, Jacob H. ‘A source
for Eliot in Shaw.’ Notes & Queries 14 1967 256-57 (Murder
in the Cathedral)
Adolph, Andrea. ‘Virginia Woolf’s
revision of a Shavian tradition.’ SHAW 21 2001 63-79 (her play Freshwater
seems based on Major Barbara)
Ahrens, Rüdiger.
‘Motivgeschichtliche Aspekte der new woman im englischen Drama der
Jahrhundertwende.’ Pp 293-320 in Heinz J. Müllenbrock & Alfons Klein, eds. Motive
und Themen in englischsprachiger Literatur als Indikatoren
literaturgeschichtlicher Prozesse. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1990 (Pinero,
Wilde, Shaw, and after)
Anderson, Maxwell. Off Broadway:
essays about the theater. NY: Sloane, 1947, 12-17: ‘Saint Bernard’; 47-54:
‘Poetry in the theater’
Arnold, Armin. ‘Georg Kaiser
und G. B. Shaw: eine Interpretation der Jüdischen Witwe.’ German Life
& Letters 23 1969 85-92
Bargainnier, Earl F. ‘Mr. Gilbert
and Mr. Shaw.’ Theatre Annual 31 1975 43-54
Barnes, Peter. ‘Shaw at play.’ SHAW
14 1994 191-97
Bertolini, John A. ‘Finding
something new to say: Rattigan eludes Shaw.’ SHAW 13 1993 93-102
Biasio, Laura del Giudice.
‘Giovanna d’Arco nel dramma de Schiller ed in quello di Shaw: crisi
individuale e crisi sociale.’ Annuario (Liceo-Ginnasio Statale ‘G.
Palmierii,’ Lecce) 1960-61 59-79
Bogard, Travis. ‘O’Neill versus
Shaw.’ Pp 66-76 in T. W. Craik, ed. The revels history of drama in English,
VIII: American drama. London: Methuen, 1977
Boza Mazvidal, A. ‘La
dramática de Shaw y Pirandello.’ Ragioni Critiche 1 1971 111-30
Bridie, James. ‘Shaw as dramatist
(including a surrealist life of G.B.S.).’ Pp 77-91 in Winsten
Bryden, Mary. ‘Coils of the
cobra: the predatory woman of Shaw and Beckett.’ New Comparison 7
1989 160-71
Bühler, Renate. ‘Drei
Lustspiele im Unterricht: Aristophanes Die Frösche, Plautus
Amphitryon, Shaw Pygmalion.’ Deutschunterricht 18 1966
88-106
Calvin, Judith S. ‘The
GBSence of Giraudoux.’ Shaw Review 5 1962 21-35
Carpenter, Charles A. Dramatists
and the bomb: American and British playwrights confront the Nuclear Age,
1945-1964. Westport, CT: Greenwood Pr., 1999, 19-26: ‘A “dramatic
extravaganza” of the projected Atomic Age: Wings Over Europe’ [by Robert
Nichols and Maurice Browne] (direct links in the play to Candida
and Back to Methuselah; revised from Modern Drama 35 1992 552-61)
Cavallini, Graziano. Ibsen,
Shaw, Pirandello: analisi della funzione socio-pedagogica del teatro.
Milan: Cislaghi, 1964, 7-13, 41-68, 113-15
Chakravorty, Byomkesh C. Rabindranath
Tagore: his mind and art. New Delhi: Young India Publications, 1971,
111-56: ‘Rabindranath as a dramatist’ (includes a comparison with Shaw)
Codignola, Luciano. Due
momenti della crisi del naturalismo teatrale: J. A. Strindberg, G. B.
Shaw. Urbino: Libreria Moderna Universitaria, 1971, 93-152
Crawford, Fred D. ‘Shaw’s
British inheritors.’ SHAW 13 1993 103-11 (Galsworthy, Coward,
Osborne, etc.; from Shavian 7 i 1991 12-16)
Dass, Veena N. ‘Bernard
Shaw’s Saint Joan, Mohan Rakesh’s One Day in Ashadha and
Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq as history plays.’ Pp 116-25 in Pandey
Dietrich, Richard F. ‘Shaw
and Yeats: two Irishmen divided by a common language.’ SHAW 15
1995 65-84
Evans, T. F. ‘Arnold Bennett
and Shaw: “You will not take the theatre seriously enough.”’ SHAW 13
1993 73-92
-----. ‘Shaw, Chesterton,
and Magic.’ SHAW 15 1995 21-35
Everding, Robert G. ‘Shaw
and Saroyan.’ Independent Shavian 24 1986 35-40
Fergusson, Francis. The
idea of a theater. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1949, 178-93: ‘The
theatricality of Shaw and Pirandello’ (from Partisan Review 16
1949 589-603)
Feschbach, Sidney. ‘Man of
letters as reformer: Thornton Wilder on George Bernard Shaw.’ Independent
Shavian 21 1983 11-17
Foster, Verna A. ‘Anxieties
and influences: the presence of Shaw in Kushner’s Angels in America.’
SHAW 22 2002 172-83 (similarities with Heartbreak House and The
Simpleton of the Unexpected Isles)
Frank, Joseph. ‘Soph v.
Shaw.’ Shaw Review 19 1976 93-94, 99 (part IV of Back to Methuselah
resembles Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex)
Galinsky, Hans. ‘G. B. Shaw
als Gegenstand der Kritik und Quelle dramatischer Anregung für T. S. Eliot.’
Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 38 1957 146-64
Geduld, Harry M. ‘Bernard
Shaw and Leo Tolstoy.’ California Shavian 4 ii 1963 1-9; ‘Bernard
Shaw and Leo Tolstoy, II—the Shavian critique of Tolstoy.’ California
Shavian 4 iii 1963 1-4
Gindin, James. ‘The belated
Shavian influence: wartime disillusion and Galsworthy’s The
Foundations.’ SHAW 10 1990 73-84
Girosi, Pablo. ‘Pirandello
y Shaw.’ Revista de Literaturas Modernas 1 1956 47-72
Grau, Jacinto. Don Juan en el
tiempo y en el espacio. Buenos Aires: Raigal, 1953, 205-08 on Man and
Superman
Green, Paul. Dramatic heritage.
NY: Samuel French, 1953, 112-31: ‘Mystical Bernard Shaw’
Grossman, Elwira M. ‘Witkacy
and Shaw’s stage statues.’ SHAW 17 1997 39-51 (similarities between Shaw
and the radical Polish dramatist Witkiewicz)
Häusermann, H. W. ‘W. J. Turner
and Bernard Shaw: a disagreement.’ English Miscellany 10 1959 293-327
Hall, Murray G. ‘Robert Musil
und die Wiener Presse, mit zwei unbekannten Thaterkritiken.’ Literatur und
Kritik 86-87 1974 368-80 (one is a review of Saint Joan)
Harris, Edward P. ‘The
liberation of flesh from stone: Pygmalion in Frank Wedekind’s Erdgeist.’
Germanic Review 52 1977 44-56
Harris, Harold J. ‘Shaw, Chekhov,
and two great ladies of the theater.’ Shaw Review 6 1963 96-99 (parallel
comments on Bernhardt and Duse)
Hatcher, Joe B. ‘Shaw the
reviewer and James’s Guy Domville.’ Modern Drama 14 1971
331-34
Huang, Jolin. Shaw and Galsworthy:
a contrast. Norwood, PA: Norwood Editions, 1977. 37 pp
Hughes, Frances. ‘Noel Coward
and Shaw: an aide-memoir.’ Shavian 9 iv 2002-03 16-18
Hugo, Leon H. ‘Punch:
J. M. Barrie’s gentle swipe at “Supershaw.”’ SHAW 10 1990 60-62;
text follows, 63-72
-----. ‘Shaw and the
twenty-nine percenters.’ SHAW 13 1993 51-71 (the other playwrights
produced during Shaw’s 71% ‘reign’ at the Court Theatre)
Johnson, Betty F. ‘Shelley’s
Cenci and Mrs Warren’s Profession.’ Shaw Review 15 1972
26-34
Johnson, Wendell S. ‘Fallen
women, lost children: Wilde and the theatre of the nineties.’ Tennessee
Studies in Literature 27, 196-211 (also cited as Don R. Cox, ed. Sexuality
and Victorian literature. Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Pr., 1984) (on
Wilde, Pinero, and Shaw)
Johnston, Denis. ‘Giants in those
days of Shaw, DeValera and Sir William Haley.’ Irish University Review 8
1978 68-73
Jordan, John. ‘Shaw, Wilde, Synge
and Yeats: ideas, epigrams, blackberries and chassis.’ Pp 209-25 in
Richard Kearney, ed. The Irish mind: exploring intellectual traditions.
Dublin: Wolfhound Pr., 1985
Joyce, Steven. ‘The
worldbetterers: philanthropists in George Bernard Shaw’s Buoyant Billions
and Thomas Bernhard’s Der Weltverbesserer.’ Comparatist 15
1991 78-85
Kapelke, Randy. ‘Preventing
censorship: the audience’s role in [Clyde Fitch’s] Sappho and Mrs.
Warren’s Profession.’ Theatre History Studies 18 1998 117-33
Kidd, Timothy J. ‘James
Elroy Flecker and Bernard Shaw.’ Shaw Review 21 1978 124-35
Kilroy, Thomas. ‘The Moon
in the Yellow River: Denis Johnston’s Shavianism.’ Pp 49-58 in
Joseph Ronsley, ed. Denis Johnston: a retrospective. Gerrards Cross:
Smythe, 1981
Klein, John W. ‘Shaw and Brieux—an
enigma.’ Drama: The Quarterly Theatre Review 67 1962 33-35
Korff, Hermann A. Lessing,
Kleist, Schiller, Shaw, Anouilh: drei Vorträge. Frankfurt: Dausien, 1962,
59-87: ‘Die heilige Johanna bei Schiller, Shaw und Anouilh’
Kornbluth, Martin L. ‘Two
fallen women: [Pinero’s] Paula Tanqueray and Kitty Warren.’ Shavian
no. 14 1959 14-15
Lausch, Anne N. ‘The road to
Rome by way of Alexandria and Tavazzano.’ Shaw Review 6 1963 2-12 (The
Road to Rome and Caesar and Cleopatra); ‘Robert Sherwood’s Heartbreak
House.’ Shaw Review 6 1963 42-50 (The Petrified Forest)
Leary, Daniel J. ‘The time
of his life: a Shavian influence.’ Pp 69-76 in Leo Hamalian, ed. William Saroyan:
the man and the writer remembered. Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson UP,
1987
Levy, Benn W. ‘Shaw the
dramatist.’ Pp 263-79 in Joad (1951 lecture)
Livermore, Ann. ‘Goldoni,
Wilde and Shaw: “co-inventors” of comedy.’ Revue de Littérature Comparée
53 1979 108-24
Mayer, Hans. ‘Johanna oder
die Vernunft des Herzens: über die Jeanne-d’Arc-Stücke von Schiller,
Shaw und Brecht.’ Theater Heute 9 vi 1968 22-27
-----. Aussenseiter.
Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1975, 42-67: ‘Skandal der Jeanne d’Arc: Schiller,
Shaw, Brecht, Wischnewski’
Meisel, Martin. ‘Shaw, Stoppard,
and “audible intelligibility.”’ SHAW 27 2007 42-58
Meister, Charles W. ‘Chekhov’s
reception in England and America.’ American Slavic and East European Review 12
1953 109-21 (comments on Heartbreak House)
-----. ‘Comparative drama: Chekhov,
Shaw, Odets.’ Poet Lore 55 1950 249-57
Mensching, Gerhard. ‘Die
Kirche auf dem Theater: Shaw—Schnitzler—Brecht—Hochhuth.’ Pp
332-45 in Religion und Religionen: Festschrift für Gustav Mensching zu
seinem 65. Geburtstag. Bonn: Roehrscheid, 1967
Michaelowski, Boris. ‘Gorki
and Shaw.’ Pp 34-47 in Ilse Stauche, ed. Maxim Gorki: Drama und Theater.
Berlin: Henschel, 1968
Middleton, George. These things
are mine: the autobiography of a journeyman playwright. NY: Macmillan,
1947, 200-213: ‘I go to London Town and Bernard Shaw explains’
Mix, Katherine L. ‘Laurence Housman
and Bernard Shaw.’ SHAW 6 1986 81-90
Morgan, Margery M. ‘Strindberg
and the English theatre.’ Modern Drama 7 1964 161-73
Morrison, Kristin. ‘“Meet in
Paradize”: Beckett’s Shavian women.’ Pp 81-90 in Linda Ben-Zvi, ed. Women
in Beckett: performance and critical perspectives. Urbana, IL: Univ. of
Chicago Pr., 1990
Munteanu, George. ‘Liviu Rebreanu
Õi G. B. Shaw.’ Teatrul (Bucharest) 4 ix 1970 62-64
Nathan, Rhoda B. ‘Candida
and Exiles: the Shaw-Joyce connection.’ Pp 97-103 in Diana A.
Ben-Merre & Maureen Murphy, eds. James Joyce and his contemporaries.
NY: Greenwood Pr., 1989; repr. in Independent Shavian 29 1991 3-11
Nethercot, Arthur. ‘Mrs.
Warren’s Profession and [Pinero’s] The Second Mrs. Tanqueray.’
Shaw Review 13 1970 26-28
Nyszkiewicz, Heinz.
‘Zielsetzungen des modernen englischen Dramas: George Bernard Shaw und William
Butler Yeats.’ Pp. 15-27 in Nyszkiewicz, ed. Zeitgenössische
englische Dichtung: Einführung in die englische Literaturbetrachtung mit
Interpretationen, III: Drama. Frankfurt: Hirschgraben, 1968
Obraztsova, Anna. ‘Bernard
Shaw’s dialogue with Chekhov.’ Pp 43-53 in Patrick Miles, ed. Chekhov
on the British stage. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993
O’Connor, Mary. ‘Did Bernard
Shaw kill John Davidson? The “tragi-comedy” of a commissioned play.’ Shaw
Review 21 1978 108-23
Omasreiter, Ria. ‘Die
Paradoxie der Heiligkeit: politische Heilige bei Shaw, Eliot und Bolt.’
Literatur in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 25 1992 151-64
Paczesny, Reinhard.
‘Haut’se, haut’se, immer auf die Schnauze, oder das Drama des Boxers in
Boxerdramen.’ Sprache im Technischen Zeitalter 92 1984 252-60 (part
compares Shaw’s The Admirable Bashville with Odets’s Golden
Boy)
Pálfy, István. ‘A rádöbbenés
dramaturgiája: Shaw, Granville Barker és Galsworthy.’ Filológiai Közlöny
18 1972 394-99
Parker, R. B. ‘The Circle
of Somerset Maugham.’ Pp 36-50 in Rosenblood 2 (compared to the
typical Shaw play)
Perkins, Richard. ‘[Michael Cook’s]
Jacob’s Wake and the European tradition.’ Canadian Drama 15 1989
159-68 (compared to Heartbreak House)
Pharand, Michel W. Bernard
Shaw and the French. Gainesville: UP of Florida, 2000, 84-97: ‘The ruthless
revealer: an encomium to Eugène Brieux’ (revised from ‘Iconoclasts of
social reform: Eugène Brieux and Bernard Shaw.’ SHAW 8 1988 97-109)
Priestley, J. B. Literature and
Western man. NY: Harper, 1960, 344-53
-----. ‘Shaw as a social
critic.’ Saturday Review of Literature 29 July 27 1946 5-7; repr. on pp
50-54 in Winsten
Rattigan, Terence. ‘Concerning the
play of ideas.’ New Statesman and Nation 39 1950 241-42; repr. on pp
74-77 in Adams; succeeding issues print replies defending Shaw’s
influence by James Bridie, Benn Levy, Peter Ustinov,
O’Casey, Shaw, etc.
Redmond, James. ‘Günter Grass:
a Kashubian G.B.S.’ Modern Drama 14 1971 104-13 (in Die Plebejer
proben den Aufstand)
Rice, Elmer. ‘Extemporaneous
remarks.’ Shaw Bulletin 2 i 1957 5-7
Richards, Shaun. ‘“Useless,
dangerous, and ought to be abolished”: the intellectual in the plays of G. B.
Shaw and Trevor Griffiths.’ Literature and History 2 (new series)
1991 60-77
Ritschel, Nelson O’C. ‘J. M.
Synge and the reconfiguration of G. B. Shaw in The Playboy.’ New
England Theatre Journal 15 2004 35-47 (Synge may have reworked the play)
Rix, Walter T. ‘Shaw und Sudermann:
von der Gemeinsamkeit der Dramatiker und ihrer unerquicklichen Stücke beim
Eintritt ins 20. Jahrhundert.’ Pp 305-32 in Rix, ed. Hermann Supermann: Werk
und Wirkung. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1980
Robinson, Gabriele S. ‘The
Shavian affinities of John Whiting.’ Shaw Review 17 1974 86-98
(draws upon ‘Beyond the waste land: an interpretation of John Whiting’s Saint’s
Day.’ Modern Drama 14 1972 463-77; the play shows affinities with Heartbreak
House)
Roby, Kinley. ‘Arnold Bennett:
Shaw’s ten o’clock scholar.’ Shaw Review 13 96-104; repr. on pp 53-62 in
Rusinko (his attempts to make a dramatist out of a novelist)
Rodríguez-Seda, Asela C. ‘Arms
and the Man y [Nemesio R. Canales’s] El héroe galopante: la
desmitificación del heroísmo.’ Latin American Theatre Review 9 1976
63-67
-----. ‘G. Bernard Shaw y
Nemesio R. Canales: relaciones e influencias.’ Sin Nombre 8 ii
1977 34-45
Rusinko, Susan. ‘Rattigan
versus Shaw: the “drama of ideas” debate.’ SHAW 2 1982 171-78
Salama, Mohammad R. ‘The
aesthetics of Pygmalion in G. B. Shaw and Tawfiq al-Hakim: a
study of transcendence and decadence.’ Journal of Arabic Literature 31
2000 222-38
Sidnell, Michael J. ‘Hic and
ille: Shaw and Yeats.’ Pp 156-78 in Robert O’Driscoll, ed. Theatre
and nationalism in twentieth-century Ireland. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto
Pr., 1971
Simon, Neil. The sheep from
the goats: selected literary essays of Neil Simon. NY: Weidenfeld &
Nicolson, 1989, 172-77: ‘The limits of intelligence: George Bernard Shaw, Collected
plays with their prefaces (definitive edition)’ (1975 essay-review)
Sparks, Julie A. ‘Shaw for
the Utopians, „apek for the anti-Utopians.’ SHAW
17 1997 165-83 (Back to Methuselah and R.U.R.)
Speckhard, Robert R. ‘Shaw
and Aristophanes: how the comedy of ideas works.’ Shaw Review 8
1965 82-92; ‘Shaw and Aristophanes: symbolic marriage and the magical doctor /
cook in Shavian comedy.’ Shaw Review 9 1966 56-65
Sprinchorn, Evert. ‘Shaw and
Strindberg.’ SHAW 13 1993 9-24
Stanton, Stephen S. ‘Shaw’s
debt to Scribe.’ PMLA 76 1961 575-85
Stokes, E. E. ‘Jonson’s
“humour”plays and some later plays of Bernard Shaw.’ Shavian 2 x 1964
13-18
Swartz, David L. ‘Bernard
Shaw and Henry James.’ Shaw Review 10 1967 50-59
Swerling, Anthony. ‘Bernard
Shaws besök hos Strindberg.’ Artes: Tidskrift för Litteratur, Konst
och Musik 7 v 1981 121-27
Sydenstricker, Glória. ‘The
Shaw / Maeterlinck touch in Granville-Barker’s drama.’ Independent
Shavian 34 1996 13-16
Thies, Henning. Namen im
Kontext von Dramen: Studien zur Funktion von Personennamen im englischen,
amerikanischen und deutschen Drama. Frankfurt: Lang, 1978, 207-23:
‘“Gefallene Frauen” bei Wilde, Pinero und Shaw’
Thornton, R. K. R. ‘Friel
and Shaw: dreams and responsibilities.’ Pp 224-33 in Paul Hyland & Neil
Sammels, eds. Irish writing: exile and subversion. Basingstoke:
Macmillan, 1991
Throne, Marilyn. ‘The social
value of the privileged class: a comparison of Shaw’s Heartbreak House
and Friel’s Aristocrats.’ Colby Library Quarterly 24 1988
162-72
Usigli, Rodolfo. Conversaciones
y encuentros. Mexico: Novaro, 1974, 13-74 (includes letters)
-----. ‘El destructor de
ídolos: sentido y forma de George Bernard Shaw.’ Cuadernos Americanos 10
1951 180-210, 251-76
Walker, Roy. ‘Theatre
Royal.’ Twentieth Century 153 1953 466-70 (Noël Coward, playing
Magnus in a production of The Apple Cart, was strongly influenced by
Shaw)
Wazzan, Adnan M. Essays
in comparative literature: an Islamic perspective. London: Ithaca Pr.,
113-31: ‘Shaw’s and al-Hakim’s Pygmalion: an analogy’
Weales, Gerald. ‘Tennessee Williams
borrows a little Shaw.’ Shaw Review 8 1965 63-64 (You Touched Me!
and Heartbreak House)
Weintraub, Rodelle. ‘The
center of life: an interview with Megan Terry.’ Pp 214-25 in Weintraub,
R
Weintraub, Stanley. ‘Eugene O’Neill:
the Shavian dimension.’ SHAW 18 1998 45-61
Wellwarth, George. ‘[Alfred
Warwick] Gattie’s glass of water; or, the origins of Breakages, Ltd.’ Shaw
Review 11 1968 99-103; ‘“Gattie’s glass of water”: addendum.’ Shaw
Review 12 1969 28-29
Wilder,
Thornton. American characteristics and other essays. Ed. Donald Gallup.
NY: Harper & Row, 1979, 88-94: ‘George Bernard Shaw’ (previously
unpublished 1968 essay)
Wiley, Catherine. ‘The matter with manners: the New Woman and the
problem play.’ Pp 109-27 in Women in theatre. Themes in drama, 11.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989 (plays by Jones, Pinero, Shaw, and
Elizabeth Robins)
Williams, Tennessee. ‘Candida: a college essay.’ Shaw Review 20
1977 60-62
Winkgens, Meinhard. ‘Shaw und Sternheim: der Individualismus als
Privatmythologie.’ Arcadia 12 1977 31-46
Worth, Katharine J. ‘Shaw and John Osborne.’ Shavian 2 x
1964 29-35