Use back arrow
above to return to the Table of Contents
PART TWO: WORKS ABOUT SPECIFIC PLAYS: A through C
The Admirable Bashville
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume II: 1898-1918: The pursuit of power. NY:
Random House, 1989, 62-66
Paczesny,
Reinhard. ‘Haut’se, haut’se, immer auf die Schnauze, oder das Drama des Boxers
in Boxerdramen.’ Sprache im Technischen Zeitalter 92 1984 252-60 (part
compares the play with Odets’s Golden Boy)
Androcles and the Lion
Abbott,
Anthony S. Shaw and Christianity. NY: Seabury Pr., 1965, 141-56: ‘The
triumph of laughter: Androcles and the Lion’
Berst,
Charles A. Bernard Shaw and the art of drama.
Brown, John
Mason. Seeing more things. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1948, 179-87 (on a
performance of the play)
Cardullo,
Bert. ‘The artistic evolvement of Androcles and the Lion.’ Studia
Neophilologica 57 1985 187-90
Dukore,
Bernard F. Bernard Shaw, playwright: aspects of Shavian drama.
Eastman,
Fred. Christ in the drama: a study of the influence of Christ on the drama
of England and America. NY: Macmillan, 1947, 44-54
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume III: 1918-1951: The lure of fantasy. NY:
Random House, 1991, 149-61
Meisel,
Martin. Shaw and the nineteenth-century theater.
Nelson,
Raymond S. ‘Wisdom and power in Androcles and the Lion.’ Yearbook of
English Studies 2 1972 192-204
O’Hara,
Michael M. ‘Federal Theatre’s Androcles and the Lion: Shaw in black and
white.’ SHAW 19 1999 129-48
Stone,
Susan C. ‘Unity in diversity: Androcles and the Lion.’ Shaw Review 21
1978 92-99
Turco,
Alfred. ‘Reflections on Androcles—self, fable, and history.’ Independent
Shavian 27 1989 51-59 (issue marked vol. 3)
Valency,
Maurice. The cart and the trumpet: the plays of George Bernard Shaw. NY:
Ward, A. C.
‘Introduction to Androcles and the Lion,’ ‘Notes on the preface . . .,’
and ‘Notes on Androcles and the Lion.’ Pp 161-208 in Shaw. Androcles
and the Lion.
Annajanska, the Bolshevik Empress
Bertolini,
John A. The playwrighting self of Bernard Shaw.
Gainor, J.
Ellen. Shaw’s daughters: dramatic and narrative constructions of gender.
Grendon,
Felix. ‘Shaw’s Annajanska.’ Shavian no. 3 1954 26-29
The Apple Cart
Altrincham,
Lord. ‘Reflections on The Apple Cart.’ National and English Review 151
July 1958 18-23
Donaghy,
Henry J. ‘The Apple Cart: a Chestertonian play.’ Shaw Review 11
1968 104-08
Dukore,
Bernard F. Bernard Shaw, playwright: aspects of Shavian drama.
Einsohn,
Howard I. ‘The intelligent reader’s guide to The Apple Cart.’ SHAW
9 1989 145-60 (its kinship with The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism
and Capitalism)
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume III: 1918-1951: The lure of fantasy. NY:
Random House, 1991, 149-61
Hugo, Leon
H.. Bernard Shaw, playwright and preacher.
Kamer,
Hansruedi. Künstlerische und politische Extravaganz im Spätwerk Shaws.
McDowell,
Frederick P. W. ‘The eternal against the expedient: structure and theme in
Shaw’s The Apple Cart.’ Modern Drama 2 1959 99-113
Miller, C.
Brook. ‘Late capitalism and the
Morgan,
Margery M. The Shavian playground: an exploration of the art of George
Bernard Shaw.
Peters,
Margot. ‘[Discovery:] Shaw vs. Stella: the battle of The Apple Cart.’ Harvard
Magazine March-April 1984 56A-H (suppressed passages from the
correspondence pertaining to their dispute over the play)
Sengupta,
Gautam. ‘A protest and a quest: a study of Shaw’s political vision in The
Apple Cart.’ Journal of the Department of English,
Smith,
Warren S. Bishop of everywhere: Bernard Shaw and the Life Force.
Walker,
Watson,
Barbara B. ‘The theater of love and the theater of politics in The Apple
Cart.’ SHAW 7 1987 207-20
Weintraub,
Stanley. ‘King Magnus and King Minus: a play and a playlet.’ SHAW 27
2007 11-27 (the play and The King, the Constitution and the Lady)
Wellwarth,
George. ‘Gattie’s glass of water; or, the origins of Breakages, Ltd.’ Shaw
Review 11 1968 99-103; ‘ “Gattie’s glass of water”: addendum.’ Shaw
Review 12 1969 28-29
Zabrouski,
Monica A., & Robert P. Kirschmann. ‘The ungendered will and the Shavian
Superman.’ SHAW 26 2006 79-99 (94-96 on King Magnus)
Arms and the Man
(see also ‘Shaw’s Screenplays’)
Alexander,
Nigel. A critical commentary on Bernard Shaw’s Arms and the Man and Pygmalion.
Amalric,
Jean C. ‘Modèle actantiel et investissement thématique: quelques remarques sur Arms
and the
-----.
‘Satire et comique plaisants et déplaisants: Mrs. Warren’s Profession et
Arms and the
Bala,
Suman. ‘Arms and the Man: the naked reality of love and war.’ Pp 63-81
in Pandey
Berst,
Charles A. ‘The action of Shaw’s settings and props.’ SHAW 3 1983 41-65
(44-47 on the play)
-----. Bernard
Shaw and the art of drama.
Blaicher,
Günther. ‘Mortifikation: ein vernachlässigter Aspekt der Komödientheorie.’ Arbeiten
aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 13 1988 139-53 (146-48 on the play)
Borkat,
Roberta F. S. ‘Swift, Shaw, and the idealistic swain.’ English Studies
61 1980 498-506 (the play and Swift’s poems)
Carpenter,
Charles A. Bernard Shaw & the art of destroying ideals: the early plays.
Chung,
Kwangsook. ‘Reading war, history, and historicity in Shaw’s Arms and the
Crompton,
Louis. ‘Introduction.’ Pp ix-xxxiii in Shaw. Arms and the
-----. Shaw
the dramatist.
Denninghaus,
Friedhelm. Die dramatische Konzeption George Bernard Shaws: Untersuchungen
zur Struktur der Bühnengesellschaft und zum Aufbau der Figuren in den Stücken
Shaws.
Dukore,
Bernard F. ‘The ablest man in
-----. Bernard
Shaw, playwright: aspects of Shavian drama.
-----, ed. Bernard
Shaw’s Arms and the Man: a composite production book.
Elliott,
Robert C. ‘Shaw’s Captain Bluntschli: a latter-day Falstaff.’ Modern
Language Notes 67 1952 461-64
Farooqui,
Khalida S. ‘Reflections upon war and humour in G. B. Shaw’s Arms and the
Gibbs, A.
M. The art and mind of Shaw: essays in criticism. NY:
-----. Bernard
Shaw: a life.
Gobin,
Pierre B. ‘La comédie militariste (1890-1930): l’évolution des techniques
scéniques et des genres littéraires.’ Pp 767-79 in Béla Köpeczi et al., eds. Actes
du VIIIe congrès de l’Association Internationale de Littérature
Comparée, I. Stuttgart: Kunst und Wissen, 1980
Goldsworthy, Vesna. Inventing Ruritania: the
imperialism of the imagination.
UP, 1998, 113-16: ‘Bernard Shaw’s
Greiner,
Norbert. Idealism und Realism im Frühwerk George Bernard Shaws: die
Bedeutung und Funktion der Begriffe in den politischen, ästhetischen und
dramatischen Schriften.
Higgs,
Calvin T. ‘Shaw’s use of Vergil’s Aeneid in Arms and the
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume I: 1856-1898: The search for love. NY:
Random House, 1988, 297-306
Innes,
Christopher. Modern British drama: the twentieth century.
Jenckes,
Norma. ‘Introduction.’ Pp xiii-xxiii in Shaw. Arms and the Man: a facsimile
of the holograph manuscript. NY:
Kaler, Anne
K. ‘Conventions of chocolate as weapons of war and peace in Shaw’s Arms and
the Man, Straus’s The Chocolate Soldier and in the MGM film version,
The Chocolate Soldier.’ Pp 47-58 in Alex Szogyi, ed. Chocolate, food
of the gods.
King,
Kiberd,
Declan. Irish classics.
Lee, J.
Scott. ‘Comic unity in Arms and the
Mills, John
A. Language and laughter: comic diction in the plays of Bernard Shaw.
Morgan,
Margery M. The Shavian playground: an exploration of the art of George
Bernard Shaw.
O’Hara,
Michael. ‘Arms and the Man and the Federal Theatre: love and war in
troubled times.’ SHAW 14 1994 145-52
Quinn,
Michael. ‘Form and intention: a negative view of Arms and the
Rodríguez-Seda,
Asela. ‘Arms and the Man y [Nemesio R. Canales’s] El héroe galopante:
la desmitificación
Saffron,
John. ‘Caesar and Bluntschli: Shaw’s view of heroism.’ Shavian 3 viii
1967 10-14
Sauer,
David K. ‘“Only a woman” in Arms and the
Sawyer,
Paul. ‘The last line of Arms and the
Styan, J.
L. The elements of drama.
-----. Modern
drama in theory and practice, I: Realism and naturalism.
Todorova,
Maria. ‘The Balkans: from discovery to invention.’ Slavic Review 53 1994
453-82 (471-74 on the play)
Turco,
Alfred. Shaw’s moral vision: the self and salvation.
Valency,
Maurice. The cart and the trumpet: the plays of George Bernard Shaw. NY:
Weintraub,
Rodelle. ‘“Oh, the dreaming, the dreaming”: Arms and the
Weiss,
Samuel A. ‘Shaw, Arms and the Man, and the Bulgarians.’ SHAW 10
1990 27-44
West,
Alick. George Bernard Shaw: ‘a good man fallen among Fabians’. NY:
International, 1950, 82-88
West, E. J.
‘“Arma virumque” Shaw did not sing.’ Colorado Quarterly 1 1953
267-80; repr. on pp 161-75 in Henry Popkin, ed. Arms and the
Augustus Does His Bit
Regan,
Arthur E. ‘The fantastic reality of Bernard Shaw: a look at Augustus and
Too True.’ Shaw Review 11 1968 2-10
Back to Methuselah
Adams,
Elsie B. Bernard Shaw and the aesthetes.
Aquino,
John. ‘Shaw and C. S. Lewis’s Space Trilogy.’ Shaw Review 18 1975
28-32
Armstrong,
Daniel. ‘Back to Methuselah: Shaw’s debt to Swift.’ Cahiers
Victoriens & Édouardiens 21 1985 63-71
Arnold,
Armin. Die Literatur des Expressionismus: sprachliche und thematische
Quellen.
Bailey, J.
O. ‘Shaw’s Life Force and science fiction.’ Shaw Review 16 1973 48-58
(stresses the play)
Barnes,
John. ‘Tropics of a desirable oxymoron: the radical superman in Back to
Methuselah.’ SHAW 17 1997 155-64
Black,
Martha F. ‘Back to Methuselah: a “grand precurser” [intentional sic]
to Finnegans Wake.’ SHAW 23 2003 7-16
Bose,
Tirthankar. ‘How far does Shaw’s thought reach in Back to Methuselah?’ Uttar
Pradesh Studies in English (
Brown,
David. ‘Shaw’s Genesis.’ Explicator 50 1991 31-32
Brustein,
Robert. The theatre of revolt.
Christopher,
J. R. ‘Methuselah, out of Heinlein by Shaw.’ Shaw Review 16 1973 79-88
Cole, Susan
A. ‘The evolutionary fantasy: Shaw and Utopian fiction.’ Shaw Review 16
1973 89-97
Conrad,
Peter. The history of English literature: one indivisible, unending book.
Crawford,
Fred D. ‘Shaw among the Houyhnhnms.’ Shaw Review 19 1976 102-19 (parts
IV and V)
Crompton,
Louis. Shaw the dramatist.
Denninghaus,
Friedhelm. Die dramatische Konzeption George Bernard Shaws: Untersuchungen
zur Struktur der Bühnengesellschaft und zum Aufbau der Figuren in den Stücken
Shaws.
Dukore,
Bernard F. Bernard Shaw, playwright: aspects of Shavian drama.
Frank,
Joseph. ‘Soph v. Shaw.’ Shaw Review 19 1976 93-94, 99 (part IV’s
affinities with Oedipus Rex)
Furlong,
William B. GBS / GKC: Shaw and Chesterton: the metaphysical jesters.
Gahan,
Peter. Shaw shadows: rereading the texts of Bernard Shaw.
Geduld,
Harry M. ‘Back to Methuselah and the Birmingham Repertory Company.’ Modern
Drama 2 1959 115-29
-----. ‘Back
to Methuselah: textual problems in Shaw.’ Pp 208-18 in Ronald Gottesman
& Scott Bennett, eds. Art and error: modern textual editing.
-----. ‘The
lineage of Lilith.’ Shaw Review 7 1964 58-61
-----.
‘Place and treatment of persons in Back to Methuselah.’ California
Shavian 5 v 1964 1-12
-----. ‘The
premiere of the Pentateuch.’
-----.
‘Shaw’s philosophy as expounded in Back to Methuselah.’ California
Shavian 5 v 1964 11-19 (from ‘Shaw’s philosophy and cosmology.’
-----.
‘Sources and influences of Shaw’s Pentateuch.’ California Shavian 5 iii
1964 1-10
Gibbs, A.
M. Bernard Shaw: a life.
Gordon,
David J. Bernard Shaw and the comic sublime. NY:
Hamilton,
Robert. ‘The philosophy of Bernard Shaw: a study of Back to Methuselah.’
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume III: 1918-1951: The lure of fantasy. NY:
Random House, 1991, 32-59
Horton,
Merrill. ‘Bergsonian laughter in Bernard Shaw’s Back to Methuselah.’ Analecta
Husserliana 56 1998 71-76
Hummert,
Paul A. Bernard Shaw’s Marxian romance.
Indick, Ben
P. ‘Shaw’s science fiction on the boards.’ SHAW 17 1997 19-37 (stresses
the play)
Innes,
Christopher. ‘Utopian apocalypses: Shaw, war, and H. G. Wells.’ SHAW 23
2003 37-46
Jameson, Fredric. Archaeologies of the future: the desire called
utopia and other science fictions.
NY: Verso, 2005, 328-44: ‘Longevity as class struggle’ (from pp. 24-42
in George E. Slusser et al., eds.
Immortal engines: life extension and immortality in science fiction and
fantasy.
Georgia Pr., 1996)
Knepper,
Bill G. ‘Shaw’s debt to [Lytton’s] The Coming Race.’ Journal of
Modern Literature 1 1971 339-53
Knörrich,
Otto. ‘G. B. Shaw—Mystiker der Ratio.’ Neueren Sprachen 3 1961 110-20
Lawrence,
Kenneth. ‘Bernard Shaw: the career of the Life Force.’ Modern Drama 15
1972 130-46 (Man and Superman, Back to Methuselah, and The
Simpleton of the Unexpected Isles as thesis dramas)
Leary,
Daniel J. ‘The ends of childhood: eschatology in Shaw and [Arthur C.] Clarke.’ Shaw
Review 16 1973 67-78
-----,
& Richard Foster. ‘Adam and Eve: evolving archetypes in Back to
Methuselah.’ Shaw Review 4 ii 1961 12-23; repr. on pp 105-18 in
Lenker,
Lagretta T. ‘Pre-Oedipal Shaw: “It’s always the mother.”’ SHAW 26 2006
36-57 (some stress on the play)
-----.
‘Why? versus why not?: Potentialities of aging in Shaw’s Back to Methuselah.’
Pp 47-59 in Sara M. Deats & Lenker,
eds. Aging and identity: a humanities perspective.
McDowell,
Frederick P. W. ‘Some reflections on Back to Methuselah in performance.’
SHAW 8 1988 153-62
Meisel,
Martin. Shaw and the nineteenth-century theater.
Miller,
Tom. ‘Forward from Fiore: a reconsideration of Back to Methuselah.’ Shavian
8 v 1998-99 12-15
Morgan,
Margery M. The Shavian playground: an exploration of the art of George
Bernard Shaw.
Nathan,
Rhoda B. ‘All about Eve: testing the Miltonic formula.’ SHAW 23 2003
65-74
Nelson,
Raymond S. ‘Back to Methuselah: Shaw’s modern Bible.’ Costerus 5
1972 117-23
Pagliaro,
Harold E. Relations between the sexes in the plays of George Bernard Shaw.
Peart,
Barbara. ‘Shelley and Shaw’s prose.’ Shaw Review 15 1972 39-45 (stresses
the preface to the play)
Peereboom,
J. J. ‘Shaw’s own Utopia.’ Pp 198-210 in Dominic Baker-Smith & C. C.
Barfoot, eds. Between dream and nature: essays on Utopia and Dystopia.
Philomène
de los Reyes, Marie. The biblical theme in modern drama.
Rankin, H.
D. ‘Plato and Bernard Shaw: their ideal communities.’ Hermathena 93 1959
71-77 (on ‘As Far As Thought Can Reach’)
Rao, Valli.
‘Back to Methuselah: a Blakean interpretation.’ SHAW 1 1981
141-81
Reitemeier,
Rüdiger. ‘Sündenfall und Übermensch in G. B. Shaws Back to Methuselah.’ Germanisch-Romanische
Monatsschrift 16 1966 65-76; repr. on pp 461-76 in Otten
Robinson,
David. ‘The development of Shaw’s teacher-hero.’
Roppen,
Georg. Evolution and poetic belief.
Rostand,
Jean. ‘Étude sur G.-B. Shaw et sa métabiologie.’ Pp 7-15 in Shaw. Retour à
Mathusalem: Pentateuque Métabiologique.
Roston, Murray.
Biblical drama in
Shippey,
Tom. ‘Skeptical speculation and Back to Methuselah.’ SHAW 17 1997
199-213
Slusser,
George. ‘Last men and first women: the dynamics of life extension in Shaw and
Heinlein.’ SHAW 17 1997 133-53
Smith,
Warren S. Bishop of everywhere: Bernard Shaw and the Life Force.
-----.
‘Future shock and discouragement: The Tragedy of an Elderly Gentleman.’ Shaw
Review 18 1975 22-27
Sparks,
Julie A. ‘Cavemen in
-----.
‘Playwrights’ progress: the evolution of the play cycle, from Shaw’s
‘Pentateuch’ to [Tony Kushner’s] Angels in America.’ SHAW 25 2005
179-200
-----. ‘Shaw
for the Utopians, „apek for
the anti-Utopians.’ SHAW 17 1997 165-83 (the play and R.U.R.)
Spiel,
Hilde. ‘Shaw und die Frauen: Methusalem zwischen Gefühl und Sinnlichkeit.’ Monat
7 Nov 1954 113-28
Stone-Blackburn,
Susan C. ‘Biblical myth Shavianized.’ Modern Drama 18 1975 153-63
-----.
‘Science and spirituality in Back to Methuselah and Last and First
Men.’ SHAW 17 1997 185-98
-----.
‘Whatever happened to Shaw’s mother-genius portrait?’ pp 130-42 in Weintraub,
R
Tanzy,
Eugene. ‘Contrasting views of man and the evolutionary process: Back to
Methuselah and Childhood’s End.’ Pp 172-95 in Joseph D. Olander
& Martin Greenberg, eds. Arthur C. Clarke. NY: Taplinger, 1977
Tippett,
Michael. ‘Back to Methuselah and “The Ice Break.”’ Shaw Review 21
1978 100-103 (Tippett notes his debt to the play)
Valderry,
Carmen. ‘Arte e immortalidad en el teatro de Bernard Shaw.’ Arbor 434
1982 107-14
Valency,
Maurice. The cart and the trumpet: the plays of George Bernard Shaw. NY:
Oxford UP, 1973, 349-68
Weintraub,
Stanley. ‘Bernard Shaw’s other Irelands: 1915-1919.’ English Literature in
Transition 42 1999 433-42 (on O’Flaherty, V.C. and ‘The Tragedy of
an Elderly Gentleman’)
-----.
Journey to heartbreak: the crucible years of Bernard Shaw 1914-1918. NY:
Weybright & Talley, 1971, 293-308
Whitman,
Robert F. Shaw and the play of ideas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1977,
257-67
Wisenthal,
J. L. The marriage of contraries: Bernard Shaw’s middle plays.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1974, 193-217
Woodbridge,
Homer. George Bernard Shaw: creative artist. Carbondale: Southern
Illinois UP, 1963, 109-15
Yorks,
Samuel. The evolution of Bernard Shaw. Washington: UP of America, 1981,
158-69
Buoyant Billions
Carpenter,
Charles A. Dramatists and the bomb: American and British playwrights
confront the Nuclear Age, 1945-1964. Westport, CT: Greenwood Pr., 1999,
55-60: ‘Shaw’s reactions to the birth of the Atomic Age’ (from SHAW 18
1998 173-79)
Dubost,
Thierry. ‘Les voies de la vérité dans Milliards flottants.’ Pp 99-118 in
Brennan
Gilkison,
Cari. ‘Zen and the art of Shaw.’ Shavian 9 i 2000 10-11
Hummert,
Paul A. Bernard Shaw’s Marxian romance. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Pr.,
1973, 204-09
Joyce,
Steven. Transformations and texts: G. B. Shaw’s Buoyant Billions.
Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1992. 135 pp (incorporates ‘The ice age cometh: a
major emendation of Buoyant Billions in critical perspective.’ SHAW
7 1987 279-99 and ‘Translation and the shape of the text: Siegfried Trebitsch’s
Zu viel Geld and George Bernard Shaw’s Buoyant Billions.’ Seminar
27 1991 136-52)
-----. ‘The
worldbetterers: philanthropists in George Bernard Shaw’s Buoyant Billions
and Thomas Bernhard’s Der Weltverbesserer.’ Comparatist 15 1991
78-85
Li, Kay. Bernard
Shaw and China: cross-cultural encounters. Gainesville: UP of Florida,
2007, 38-44: ‘Shaw and Sir Robert Ho
Tung: hybridization and cultural infusion’ (from ‘Hong Kong in Buoyant Billions:
the exotic in Bernard Shaw.’ SHAW 15 1995 57-62)
McDowell,
Frederick P. W. ‘The world, God, and world bettering: Shaw’s Buoyant
Billions.’ Boston University Studies in English 3 1957 167-76
Nickson,
Richard. ‘The world betterer: Shav versus Shav.’ Shaw Review 2 ix 1959
39-44; repr. in Independent Shavian 20 1982 9-16
Caesar and Cleopatra
(see also ‘Shaw’s Screenplays’)
Adams,
Elsie B. ‘Shaw’s Caesar and Cleopatra: decadence barely averted.’
Shaw Review 18 1975 79-82
Austin,
Don. ‘Dramatic structure in Caesar and Cleopatra.’ California Shavian
3 v 1962 unpaged
Bentley,
Eric. A century of hero-worship: a study of the idea of heroism in Carlyle
and Nietzsche, with notes on other hero-worshippers of modern times.
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1944, 183-201: ‘Bernard Shaw, Caesar, and Stalin’
Berst,
Charles A. ‘The action of Shaw’s settings and props.’ SHAW 3 1983 41-65
(53-59 on the play)
-----. Bernard
Shaw and the art of drama. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Pr., 1973, 75-95: ‘Caesar
and Cleopatra: an anatomy of greatness’ (from ‘The anatomy of greatness in Caesar
and Cleopatra.’ Journal of English and Germanic Philology 68 1969
74-91)
Bertolini,
John A. The playwrighting self of Bernard Shaw. Carbondale: Southern
Illinois UP, 1991, 9-26: ‘Caesar and Cleopatra: the heroic self’ (from
‘Shaw’s ironic view of Caesar.’ Twentieth Century Literature 27 1981
331-42)
Bielecka,
Malgorzata. G. B. Shaw’s unconventional hero in Three Plays for Puritans.
Suffolk: anima publishing, 2006. 71 pp [not yet examined]
Bonerandi,
Joseph. ‘Nietzsche et Bernard Shaw, commenteurs de Shakespeare.’ Pp 427-42 in
Jean P. Fenaux, ed. Jules César de William Shakespeare et l’honneur.
Paris: Marketing, 1979
Brainerd,
Barron, & Victoria Neufeldt. ‘On Marcus’ methods for the analysis of the
strategy of a play.’ Poetics 10 1974 31-74 (the play is one of four
examples)
Brooks,
Harold F. ‘Shavian sources in the notes to “Queen Mab.”’ Shaw Review 20
1977 83-84
Carpenter,
Charles A. Bernard Shaw & the art of destroying ideals: the early plays.
Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Pr., 1969, 168-91
Couchman,
Gordon W. This our Caesar: a study of Bernard Shaw’s Caesar and
Cleopatra. The Hague: Mouton, 1973. 183 pp (incorporates ‘Shaw, Caesar, and the
critics.’ Speech Monographs 23 1956 262-71; ‘Here was a Caesar: Shaw’s
comedy today.’ PMLA 72 1957 272-85;‘Comic catharsis in Caesar and
Cleopatra.’ Shaw Review 3 i 1960 11-14; and ‘The first playbill of Caesar:
Shaw’s list of authorities.’ Shaw Review 8 1970 79-82); for further
treatment of the comparison between Shakespeare’s play and Shaw’s see his ‘Antony
and Cleopatra and the subjective convention.’ PMLA 76 1961 420-25
Crompton,
Louis. Shaw the dramatist. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Pr., 1969, 59-73
Deans,
Marjorie. Meeting at the sphinx: Gabriel Pascal’s production of Bernard
Shaw’s Caesar and Cleopatra. London: MacDonald, 1946. 114 pp
Dukore,
Bernard F. Bernard Shaw, playwright: aspects of Shavian drama. Columbia:
Univ. of Missouri Pr., 1973, 177-85 (from ‘“Too much of a good thing”?
Structural features of Caesar and Cleopatra.’ Educational Theatre
Journal 25 1973 193-98)
Gainor, J.
Ellen. Shaw’s daughters: dramatic and narrative constructions of gender.
Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Pr., 1991, 213-19
Greiner,
Norbert. Idealism und Realism im Frühwerk George Bernard Shaws: die Bedeutung
und Funktion der Begriffe in den politischen, ästhetischen und dramatischen
Schriften. Heidelberg: Winter, 1977, 284-96: ‘Der natural leader als
Held in The Man of Destiny und Caesar and Cleopatra’ (291-96 on
the play)
Grene,
Nicholas. Bernard Shaw: a critical view. London: Macmillan, 1984, 44-52
Halawany,
Mona el- . ‘The image of Egypt in G. B. Shaw’s Caesar and Cleopatra.’ Pp
125-40 in Hoda Gindi, ed. Images of Egypt in twentieth century literature.
Cairo: Dept. of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, Univ. of
Cairo, 1991
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume II: 1898-1918: The pursuit of power. NY:
Random House, 1989, 14-20
Horzyca,
Wilam. O dramacie. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Artystyczne i Filmowe, 1969,
214-18: ‘Lepsze nió
Shakespeare.’ (1947 essay on the play)
Hugo, Leon
H.. Bernard Shaw, playwright and preacher. London: Methuen, 1971, 101-17
Hummert,
Paul A. Bernard Shaw’s Marxian romance. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Pr.,
1973, 105-10
King, Annie P.
‘Shakespeare’s Shavian Cleopatra.’ SHAW 27 2007 165-74
Larson,
Gale K. ‘Caesar and Cleopatra: the making of a history play.’ Shaw
Review 14 1971 73-89
-----.
‘Introduction.’ Pp vii-xxiv in Shaw. Caesar and Cleopatra. Indianapolis:
Bobbs-Merrill, 1974
Leary,
Daniel J. ‘The moral dialectic in Caesar and Cleopatra.’ Shaw Review 5
1962 42-53
Lenker,
Lagretta T., & Valerie B. Lipscomb. ‘Reflections of the aging Caesar: drama
as cultural perspective.’ Journal of Aging and Identity 7 2002 275-86
(focuses on Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Shaw’s character)
Loon Seong
Yun, Robin. ‘Rewriting Shakespeare and Englishness: George Bernard Shaw’s Caesar
and Cleopatra.’ Pp 227-43 in Andrew Benjamin et al., eds. Postcolonial
cultures and literatures: modernity and the (un) Commonwealth. NY: Lang,
2002
Mason,
Michael. ‘Caesar and Cleopatra: a Shavian exercise in both hero worship
and belittlement.’ Humanities Association Review 25 1974 1-10
Maurino,
Ferdinando. ‘And the ides failed.’ Arlington Quarterly 2 1969 50-56
Meisel,
Martin. ‘Cleopatra and “The Flight into Egypt.”’ Shaw Review 7 1964
62-63 (Sphinx scene echoes a Merson painting)
Müller,
Wolfgang G. ‘George Bernard Shaw and Shakespeare: an intertextual analysis of Caesar
and Cleopatra.’ Pp 99-114 in Jürgen Kamm, ed. Twentieth-century theatre
and drama in English: Festschrift for Heinz Kosok on the occasion of his 65th
Birthday. Trier: Wissenschaftliche Verlag, 1999
Otten,
Kurt. ‘George Bernard Shaw: Caesar and Cleopatra.’ Pp 347-61 in Heinz
Kosok, ed. Das englische Drama im 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts: Interpretationen.
Berlin: Schmidt, 1976
Pagliaro,
Harold E. Relations between the sexes in the plays of George Bernard Shaw.
Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Pr., 2004, 181-89
Petroviƒ, Mirjana. ‘Stilske odlike i zna…enja knjiñevnih mesta u Šoovom Cesaru i Kleopatri.’ Mostovi
(Pljevlja) 13 1982 39-45
Reardon,
Joan. ‘Caesar and Cleopatra and the commedia dell’arte.’ Shaw Review 14
1971 120-36
Reinert,
Otto. ‘Old history and new: anachronism in Caesar and Cleopatra.’ Modern
Drama 3 1960 37-41; see also ‘Comment.’ Pp 222-28 in Reinert, ed. Modern
Drama: alternate edition. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966
Relich,
Mario. ‘Shaw, Carlyle and the sphinx.’ Pp 84-97 in Bernhard Kerber, ed. Geschichte
als Paradigma: zur Reflexion des Historischen in der Kunst. Bonn: Habelt,
1982
Richmond-Garza,
Elizabeth M. ‘“Like a woman rising from a tomb”: Salomé, Cleopatra and
Victorian Egypt.’ Pp 217-33 in Krystyna Kujawi½ska
Courtney & John M. Mercer, eds. The globalization of Shakespeare in the
nineteenth century. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Pr., 2003
Robson, E.
W., & M. M. Robson. Bernard Shaw among the innocents. London:
Sydneyan Society, 1946. 31 pp
Roy, R. N.
George Bernard Shaw’s historical plays. Delhi: Macmillan, 1976, 24-43
Saffron,
John. ‘Caesar and Bluntschli: Shaw’s view of heroism.’ Shavian 3 viii
1967 10-14
Saunders,
M. Sean. ‘From metropolis to “impossible edges”: Shaw’s imperial abjects.’ SHAW
22 2002 99-115 (in this play and Captain Brassbound’s
Conversion)
Studencki,
W»adys»aw. Szkice literackie: wielcy i mali. Opole:
Prace Opolskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciól Nauk, 1967, 3-46: ‘Kleopatra VII’
(literary versions, including Shaw’s)
Tetzeli von
Rosador, Kurt. Das englische Geschichtsdrama seit Shaw. Heidelberg:
Winter, 1976, 125-60 (135-45 on the play)
Valency,
Maurice. The cart and the trumpet: the plays of George Bernard Shaw. NY:
Oxford UP, 1973, 171-77
Vesonder,
Timothy G. ‘Shaw’s Caesar and the mythic hero.’ Shaw Review 21 1978
72-79 (Wagner’s Siegfried)
Vitoux,
Pierre. ‘Le César de Mommsen et le César de G.-B. Shaw.’ Pp 347-54 in R.
Chevallier, ed. Présence de César. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1985
-----.
‘Shaw and “the Mommsenite view of Caesar.”’ Cahiers Victoriens &
Édouardiens 9-10 1979 95-106
Ward, A. C.
‘Introduction’ and ‘Notes.’ Pp 135-78 in Shaw. Caesar and Cleopatra: A
History. London: Longmans, Green, 1960
Weintraub,
Stanley. ‘Caesar and Cleopatra—a Melbourne-Victorian dimension.’ Shavian
6 vi 1988 6-8
-----. The
unexpected Shaw: biographical approaches to G.B.S. and his work. NY: Ungar,
1982, 111-23: ‘Shaw’s Mommsenite Caesar’ (first publ. on pp 257-72 in Philip A.
Shelley & Arthur O. Lewis, eds. Anglo-German and American-German
crosscurrents, II. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Pr., 1962)
Whiting,
George W. ‘The Cleopatra rug scene: another source.’ Shaw Review 3 i
1960 15-17
Whitman,
Robert F. Shaw and the play of ideas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1977,
201-10
Wisenthal,
J. L. ‘Introduction.’ Pp xiii-xxiii in Shaw. The Man of Destiny &
Caesar and Cleopatra: facsimiles of
the holograph manuscripts. NY: Garland, 1981
-----.
‘Shaw and Ra: religion and some history plays.’ SHAW 1 1981 45-56
(stresses the play)
-----. Shaw’s
sense of history. Oxford: Clarendon Pr., 1988, 58-62 and see index
Candida
Adams,
Elsie B. Bernard Shaw and the aesthetes. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1971,
24-30, 107-12
-----.
‘Bernard Shaw’s pre-Raphaelite drama.’ PMLA 81 1966 428-38; retorts and
surrejoinders between Richard Nickson and Adams: PMLA 84 1969 597-607
Adler,
Jacob H. ‘Ibsen, Shaw and Candida.’ Journal of English and Germanic
Philology 59 1960 50-58; repr. on pp 258-67 in Stephen S. Stanton, ed. A
casebook on Candida. NY: Crowell, 1962
Adler, Thomas
P. ‘Candida as a “Mystery.”’ SHAW 2 1982 13-15
Bergman,
Herbert. ‘Comedy in Candida.’ Shavian 4 1972 161-69
Berst,
Charles A. ‘The action of Shaw’s settings and props.’ SHAW 3 1983 41-65
(47-53 on the play)
-----. Bernard
Shaw and the art of drama. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Pr., 1973, 39-74: ‘Candida:
the poetry of characterization’
-----. ‘The
craft of Candida.’ College Literature 1 1974 157-73
Cardullo,
Bert. Dramatic
considerations: essays in criticism, 1977-1987. NY: Lang, 1991, 153-64:
‘The mystery of Candida’ (repr. from SHAW 6 1986 91-100)
Carpenter,
Charles A. Bernard Shaw & the art of destroying ideals: the early plays.
Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Pr., 1969, 98-123
Crompton,
Louis. Shaw the dramatist. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Pr., 1969, 29-44
Dervin,
Daniel. Bernard Shaw: a psychological study. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell UP,
1975, 238-44 (Candida compared to Ann in Man and Superman)
Doan,
William. ‘Candida: the eye on duty.’ SHAW 22 2002 131-47
(artistic images)
Dukore,
Bernard F. Bernard Shaw, playwright: aspects of Shavian drama. Columbia:
Univ. of Missouri Pr., 1973, 53-62
Finney,
Gail. Women in modern drama: Freud, feminism, and European theater at
the turn of the century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1989, 187-206: ‘The New
Woman as madonna: Shaw’s Candida’
Freedman,
Morris. ‘Reading drama.’ Colorado Quarterly 7 1960 368-78 (the play is a
central example in an argument for close reading)
Gahan,
Peter. Shaw shadows: rereading the texts of Bernard Shaw. Gainesville:
UP of Florida, 2004, 192-213
Gainor, J.
Ellen. Shaw’s daughters: dramatic and narrative constructions of gender.
Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Pr., 1991, 25-32
Galliou,
Patrick. ‘Traddutore, traditore? Candida sur les scènes françaises.’ Pp
139-58 in Brennan
Ganz,
Arthur. George Bernard Shaw. London: Macmillan, 1983, 104-15
Gibbs, A.
M. The art and mind of Shaw: essays in criticism. NY: St. Martin’s Pr.,
1983, 80-89: ‘The case against Candida’
Gilkes, A.
N. ‘Candour about Candida.’ Fortnightly 171 1952 122-27
Greiner,
Norbert. Idealism und Realism im Frühwerk George Bernard Shaws: die
Bedeutung und Funktion der Begriffe in den politischen, ästhetischen und
dramatischen Schriften. Heidelberg: Winter, 1977, 209-30: ‘Candida:
konventionelle Formen der Opposition und dialektische Umkehrung idealistischer
Tätigkeitsbereiche’
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume I: 1856-1898: The search for love. NY:
Random House, 1988, 314-25
Holt,
Charles L. ‘Candida: the music of ideas.’ Shaw Review 9 1966 2-14
Hugo, Leon
H.. Bernard Shaw, playwright and preacher. London: Methuen, 1971, 94-101
Hung,
Josephine H. ‘The Candida character in Kuan Han-ching’s The Riverside
Pavilion.’ Tamkang Review 2-3 1971-72 295-308
King,
Carlyle. ‘The rhetoric of Candida.’ Modern Drama 2 1959 71-83;
repr. on pp 243-58 in Stephen S. Stanton, ed. A casebook on Candida. NY:
Crowell, 1962
Kohl,
Norbert H. Bernard Shaws viktorianisches Erbe. Heidelberg: Winter, 1992,
197-205
Kutzsch,
Gerhard. Der Fall Candida: eine kritische Studie über George Bernard
Shaw. Leipzig: Koehler & Amelang, 1941. 124 pp
Lauter,
Paul. ‘Candida and Pygmalion: Shaw’s subversion of stereotypes.’ Shaw
Review 3 iii 1960 14-19
Lazenby,
Walter. ‘Love and “vitality” in Candida.’ Modern Drama 20 1977
1-19
Lucas, John.
‘Dickens and Shaw: women and marriage in David Copperfield and Candida.’
Shaw Review 22 1979 13-22
Miller,
Ronald R. ‘O’Neill’s Servitude, Shaw’s Candida, and the comic
vision.’ Pp 157-68 in Karelisa V. Hartigan, ed. Text and presentation: the
University of Florida Department of Classics Comparative Drama Conference
papers, volume VIII. Lanham, MD: UP of America, 1988
Mills, John
A. Language and laughter: comic diction in the plays of Bernard Shaw.
Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Pr., 1969, 30-37, 74-79
Moore,
James Mavor. ‘Why “James Mavor” Morell?’ Shaw Review 23 1980 48-51
Morgan,
Margery M. The Shavian playground: an exploration of the art of George
Bernard Shaw. London: Methuen, 1972, 64-82: ‘The virgin mother’
Nathan,
Rhoda B. ‘Candida and Exiles: the Shaw-Joyce connection.’ Pp
97-103 in Diana A. Ben-Merre & Maureen Murphy, eds. James Joyce and his
contemporaries. NY: Greenwood Pr., 1989; repr. in Independent Shavian
29 1991 3-11
-----. ‘A
clue to Candida’s secret?’ Times Literary Supplement 5163 March
15 2002 14-15; repr. in Independent Shavian 40 2002 51-54 (a letter has
come to light)
Nelson,
Raymond S. ‘Introduction.’ Pp vii-xxiii in Shaw. Candida: A Mystery.
Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973
-----.
‘Shaw’s pre-Raphaelite play.’ Pre-Raphaelite Review 1 i 1977 89-94
Nethercot,
Arthur. Men and supermen: the Shavian portrait gallery. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard UP, 1954, 7-17: ‘The truth about Candida’ (revised from PMLA 64
1949 639-47)
-----. ‘Who
was Eugene Marchbanks?’ Shaw Review 15 1972 2-20
Otten,
Terry. ‘Candida and Henry Higgins: Shaw’s mentors to the human spirit.’ Discourse
11 1968 312-16
Pagliaro,
Harold E. Relations between the sexes in the plays of George Bernard Shaw.
Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Pr., 2004, 102-11 (incorporates part of ‘Truncated
love in Candida and Heartbreak House.’ SHAW 24 2004
204-14)
Peart,
Barbara. ‘De Quincey and Marchbanks.’ Shaw Review 17 1974 139-40
Peters,
Sally. Bernard Shaw: the ascent of the Superman. New Haven, CT: Yale UP,
1996, 163-66 (Marchbanks as homosexual)
Silver,
Arnold J. Bernard Shaw: the darker side. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP,
1982, 79-115: ‘Candida: home truths’
Squarzina,
Luigi. De Dioniso a Brecht: pensiero teatrale e azione scenica. Bologna:
Mulino, 1988, 217-29: ‘La commedia preraffaellita di Shaw’ (1980 essay)
Smith, J.
Percy. ‘Introduction.’ Pp xiii-xxii in Shaw. Candida and How He Lied to
Her Husband: facsimiles of the holograph manuscripts. NY: Garland, 1981
Stafford,
Tony. ‘“The end of the hearth and home”: the deconstructing fireplace in Shaw’s
early plays.’ Independent Shavian 44 2006 17-30 (23-30 on the play)
Stanton,
Stephen S., ed. A casebook on Candida. NY: Crowell, 1962. 292 pp (text,
Shaw statements, excerpts from reviews and criticisms, two reprinted articles)
Valency,
Maurice. The cart and the trumpet: the plays of George Bernard Shaw. NY:
Oxford UP, 1973, 118-35
Wanquet,
Eileen. ‘Qui mène le jeu? Étude sémiotique de Candida de G. B. Shaw.’ Alizes:
Revue Angliciste de la Réunion 2-3 1991-92 19-32
Watson,
Barbara B. A Shavian guide to the intelligent woman. London: Chatto
& Windus, 1964, 64-68 and see index
Wellens,
Oskar. ‘Candida in French (1907).’ Shavian 7 vii 1995 6-11
West,
Alick. George Bernard Shaw: ‘a good man fallen among Fabians’. NY:
International, 1950, 104-13
White,
Patrick. ‘Candida: Bernard Shaw’s Chaucerian drama.’ SHAW 12 1992
213-28
Whitman,
Robert F. Shaw and the play of ideas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1977,
195-201
Williams,
Tennessee. ‘Candida: a college essay.’ Shaw Review 20 1977 60-62
Wittman,
Robert. Candida; or, what Shaw really meant. Hicksville, NY: Exposition
Pr., 1974. 111 pp (amateurish Freudian approach)
Woodfield,
James. ‘Shaw’s Candida: a comedy.’ English Studies in Canada 16
1990 433-52
Yarrison,
Betsy C. ‘Marchbanks as “albatros”: an interpretation of Candida.’
Shaw Review 20 1977 71-82 (Baudelaire’s artist and Shaw’s)
Captain Brassbound’s Conversion
Alexander,
Doris. ‘Captain Brant and Captain Brassbound: the origin of an O’Neill character.’
Modern Language Notes 74 1959 306-10
Bielecka,
Malgorzata. G. B. Shaw’s unconventional hero in Three Plays for Puritans.
Suffolk: anima publishing, 2006. 71 pp [not yet examined]
Brewer,
Mary F. Staging whiteness. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan UP, 2005, 6-11:
‘Militant whiteness: G. B. Shaw’s Captain Brassbound’s Conversion’
Carpenter,
Charles A. Bernard Shaw & the art of destroying ideals: the early plays.
Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Pr., 1969, 191-206
Davis,
Tracy C. George Bernard Shaw and the socialist theatre. Westport, CT:
Greenwood Pr., 1994, 15-20
Duerksen,
Roland A. ‘Shelleyan witchcraft: the unbinding of Brassbound.’ Shaw Review 15
1972 21-25
Greiner,
Norbert. Idealism und Realism im Frühwerk George Bernard Shaws: die
Bedeutung und Funktion der Begriffe in den politischen, ästhetischen und
dramatischen Schriften. Heidelberg: Winter, 1977, 259-70: ‘Captain
Brassbound’s Conversion: die Wiederaufnahme wesentlicher Strukturschemata
des dramatischen Frühwerks’
Hark, Ina
R. ‘Lady Cicely, I presume: converting the heathen, Shavian style.’ SHAW
1 1981 57-73
Holroyd,
Michael. Bernard Shaw, volume II: 1898-1918: The pursuit of power. NY:
Random House, 1989, 20-30
Mason,
Michael. ‘Captain Brassbound and Governor Eyre.’ Shavian 2 vii 1963
20-22 (historical background)
-----. ‘Captain
Brassbound’s Conversion: a coat of many colours.’ Signum 1 May 1974
23-29
Mills, John
A. Language and laughter: comic diction in the plays of Bernard Shaw.
Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Pr., 1969, 37-42, 80-82
Nelson,
Raymond S. ‘The quest for justice in Captain Brassbound’s Conversion.’ Iowa
English Bulletin Yearbook 21 1971 3-9
Pagliaro,
Harold E. Relations between the sexes in the plays of George Bernard Shaw.
Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Pr., 2004, 117-22, 172-75
Saunders,
M. Sean. ‘From metropolis to “impossible edges”: Shaw’s imperial abjects.’ SHAW
22 2002 99-115 (in this play and Caesar and Cleopatra)
Teytaud,
Jean-P. ‘Shaw et le Maroc de Cunninghame Graham.’ Études Anglaises 47
1994 284-94 (the play and Graham’s Mogreb-el-Acksa)
Valency,
Maurice. The cart and the trumpet: the plays of George Bernard Shaw. NY:
Oxford UP, 1973, 181-96
Watson,
Barbara B. A Shavian guide to the intelligent woman. London: Chatto
& Windus, 1964, 68-74
Weintraub,
Rodelle. ‘Captain Brassbound’s roots: the ancestry of a play.’ Pp 117-25
in Heinz Kosok, ed. Studies in Anglo-Irish literature. Bonn: Bouvier,
1982
-----.
‘Introduction.’ Pp xiii-xxv in Shaw. Captain Brassbound’s Conversion: a
facsimile of the holograph manuscript. NY: Garland, 1981
Weintraub,
Stanley. The unexpected Shaw: biographical approaches to G.B.S. and his work.
NY: Ungar, 1982, 105-10: ‘Shaw’s Lady Cicely and Mary Kingsley’ (first publ. on
pp 185-92 in Weintraub, R)
The Cassone
Greiner,
Norbert. Idealism und Realism im Frühwerk George Bernard Shaws: die
Bedeutung und Funktion der Begriffe in den politischen, ästhetischen und
dramatischen Schriften. Heidelberg: Winter, 1977, 163-68: ‘The Cassone:
ein Fragment von 1890’
Cymbeline Refinished
Dukore,
Bernard F. Bernard Shaw, playwright: aspects of Shavian drama. Columbia:
Univ. of Missouri Pr., 1973, 211-15
Greenman,
David J. ‘Shakespeare improved—a little: Shaw’s Cymbeline revisited.’ Shakespeare
and Renaissance Association of West Virginia: Selected Papers 24 2001 64-76
Leary,
Daniel J. ‘Shaw versus Shakespeare: the refinishing of Cymbeline.’ Educational
Theatre Journal 30 1978 5-25
Peters,
Sally. ‘Shaw’s double dethroned: The Dark Lady of the Sonnets, Cymbeline
Refinished, and Shakes Versus Shav.’ SHAW 7 1987 301-16
Rozett,
Martha T. Talking back to Shakespeare. Newark: Univ. of Delaware Pr.,
1994, 141-44
Scharine,
Richard G. ‘Blaming the bard: Shaw’s fifty years of refinishing Cymbeline.’
Journal of the Wooden O Symposium 2 2002 150-60
Stamm,
Rudolf. The shaping powers at work: fifteen essays on poetic transmutation.
Heidelberg: Winter, 1967, 130-45: ‘George Bernard Shaw and Shakespeare’s Cymbeline’;
previously publ. on pp 254-66 of Don C. Allen, ed. Studies in honor of T. W.
Baldwin. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Pr., 1958
West, E. J.
‘Shaw, Shakespeare, and Cymbeline.’ Theatre Annual 8 1950 7-24