9. JOB SATISFACTION
AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT
Job attitudes: How people feel about their jobs
Job satisfaction: Like/dislike job and job facets
Organizational commitment: Attachment to
the job
Measurement
Questionnaires
Interviews
ANTECEDENTS
Environmental
Job characteristics
Pay, justice not amount
Role variables
Role ambiguity and role conflict
Work-family conflict
Supervisory behavior
Personal
Demographics
Age
Country
Gender
Race
Personality
Locus of Control
Negative Affectivity
JOB DESIGN
"If only it weren't for the people, the damned
people", said Finnerty "always getting tangled up in the
machinery. If it weren't for them Earth
would be an engineer's paradise." Kurt Vonnegut, Player Piano
HISTORY
Simplification
Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, 1850: Describes pin
making
as taking 18 separate operations, each done by a
different
worker
Frederick Taylor, Turn of the century, Simplification
and
standarization
of work.
Problems
Employee rebellion: Simple work boring
Absence, dissatisfaction, lateness, sabotage, strikes,
turnover
Solutions
1940's to 1950's
Job enlargement: increased variety, job rotation
Job enrichment:
increase control & responsibility
Herzberg 2 factor theory promoted the idea of worker
seeks
growth
JOB CHARACTERISTICS
THEORY
Hackman and Oldham
Core characteristics >> Psychological states
>>Outcomes
|
Skill variety Task identity Task significance Autonomy Feedback |
Experienced meaningfulness Responsibility Knowledge of results |
Attendance Job performance Job satisfaction Motivation |
Growth Need
Strength
Research mixed linking objective characteristics to
outcomes
Research supports linking subjective perceptions to
outcomes
Other characteristics have been linked to job
satisfaction
Cycle
time: How long it takes to complete an entire task
Passive
monitoring: Watching someone or something and
waiting
for an event, e.g., a dial to go into the danger zone.
(Melamed
et al., 1995, Journal of Applied Psychology)
TRADITIONAL FACTORY
Assembler
Does single
operation
Low skill
Quick
acquisition
Standardization
Quality control inspector
Inspects
output at end of line
May merely
discard rejects
May fix
rejects
Service
By phone,
letter, or service calls
Maintenance
Fixes tools
and equipment
Foreman
Supervises: System encourages directive style since
single assembler failure stops
production
Hires, fires, disciplines
Assigns tasks
Trains
Work schedules
Orders tools & equipment
WORK-FAMILY
CONFLICT
Incompatible demands of work and family
Relates to job satisfaction for men and women
Relation
stronger for women, especially professionals
(Kossek
& Ozeki, 1998, Journal of Applied Psychology)
Effects on the family
Test of
a model
Work-family
conflict >> job dissatisfaction>>
parent
behavior>>school performance
(Stewart
& Barling, 1996, Journal of Organizational Behavior)
Solution
Family friendly work policies
Flexible
work schedules
On site
day care
Can
reduce job dissatisfaction
DEMOGRAPHICS AND
JOB SATISFACTION
Age
Job
Satisfaction curvilinear with age, at first declining and then
increasing
with a low at age 26 to 31
Adjustment to work
Modifying
job situation
Country differences
Overall
Western
countries tend to be highest
Asian
countries tend to be lowest, esp. Japan
Facet differences
Americans
very unhappy with rewards
Asians
moderately positive on most things
Comparison of facets across five countries on the Job
Satisfaction Survey
|
Facet |
Dominican Republic |
Hong Kong |
Jamaica |
Singapore |
US |
|
Pay |
17.2 |
15.0 |
5.8 |
14.0 |
11.8 |
|
Promotion |
16.4 |
14.2 |
9.4 |
13.4 |
11.8 |
|
Supervision |
20.0 |
16.0 |
17.5 |
13.4 |
18.6 |
|
Benefits |
16.8 |
14.4 |
6.1 |
14.2 |
14.3 |
|
Contingent rewards |
17.8 |
14.9 |
9.3 |
17.3 |
13.5 |
|
Procedures |
12.3 |
12.1 |
13.0 |
17.0 |
13.6 |
|
Coworkers |
20.0 |
15.6 |
17.0 |
13.4 |
17.9 |
|
Work |
22.2 |
14.9 |
18.3 |
17.1 |
18.9 |
|
Communication |
18.1 |
14.9 |
13.4 |
14.9 |
14.2 |
|
Total |
160.9 |
133.3 |
110.0 |
134.7 |
133.4 |
|
Sample size |
148 |
136 |
143 |
182 |
24713 |
Note: Dominican data were from Marion-Landais,
1992; Hong Kong, Lammond, 1995; Jamaican, a doctoral dissertation by Zia Mian,
1997; Singapore, Spector &
Wimalasiri, 1986; US norms for the JSS available on this website. The first
three samples were limited, and are not good representations of their
respective countries.
Gender
Usually
no differences despite job differences
Paradox
of the contented woman worker
Race
Usually
no differences or very small
Difficult
to find equivalent samples
POTENTIAL EFFECTS
Job Performance
Withdrawal
Absence
Turnover
Counterproductive behavior
Health and Well‑being – difficult link
See
chapter 10
ORGANIZATIONAL
COMMITMENT
Two perspectives
One commitment, three components – Mowday, Steers, Porter
Acceptance
of organization goals
Intention
to stay on the job
Willingness
to work hard
Three commitments – Meyer and Allen
Affective:
like the job
Continuance:
need the job
Normative:
feel obligated to stay on the job
Similar antecedents and effects as job satisfaction
HOFSTEDE’S
DIMENSIONS OF CULTURE VALUES
Individualism: people
focus on their own interests and needs vs. Collectivism which is a focus
on other people.
Masculinity: extent to which organizations focus on
achievement and job performance as opposed to health and well-being of
employees.
Power distance: tolerance for power and status
differences among levels of an organization.
Uncertainty avoidance: level of
comfort in situations that are unpredictable.
Rule and procedure orientation.
Collectivistic countries – more job
satisfaction with social aspects
of the job such
as coworkers or supervisors.
Hofstede’s Dimensions By Country
|
Dimension |
Highest |
Lowest |
US |
|
Individualism |
US, Australia |
Venezuela, Colombia |
Highest |
|
Masculinity |
Japan, Austria |
Sweden, Norway |
Upper third |
|
Power distance |
Philippines, Mexico |
Austrial, Israel |
Lower third |
|
Uncertainty avoidance |
Greece, Portugal |
Singapore, Denmark |
Lower third |
Source: Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences:
International differences in work-related values. Abridged Edition,
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Copyright
Paul E. Spector, All rights reserved, July 22, 2002.